Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation Hide — Main navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • The Chair
    • Inquiry Team
    • Expert Groups
    • Inquiry Intermediaries
    • Core Participants
    • Legal Representatives
    • Financial Reports
  • Approach
    • Terms of reference
    • List of Issues
    • Statements of approach
    • Inquiry Principles
  • News
    • News
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Reports
    • Compensation Framework Study
    • First Interim Report
    • Second Interim Report
    • The Inquiry Report
  • Publication Day
  • Evidence
    • Evidence
    • Hearings Archive
  • Compensation
  • Support
    • Confidential Psychological Support
    • Interim Payments
    • Support Groups
    • Get in touch
    • Infected Blood Support Schemes
    • Treatment and aftercare
    • Medical Evidence
    • Expenses Guidance
Accessibility Tool
  • Zoom in
  • Zoom out
  • Reset
  • Contrast
  • Accessibility tool
Get in touch

Quick Exit

During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James conceded that there had been no other similar loss of documentation on other litigation cases at the time.

  • Read more about During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James conceded that there had been no other similar loss of documentation on other litigation cases at the time.

During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she was working with Charles Lister to assess where the missing documents were.

  • Read more about During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she was working with Charles Lister to assess where the missing documents were.

Dr Rejman informed Anita James that GEB/1 Volume 4 was missing.

  • Read more about Dr Rejman informed Anita James that GEB/1 Volume 4 was missing.

During her oral evidence, Anita James was of the view that an earlier systematic assessment would not have helped locate more of the missing documents due to the passage of time and people's memories fading.

  • Read more about During her oral evidence, Anita James was of the view that an earlier systematic assessment would not have helped locate more of the missing documents due to the passage of time and people's memories fading.

Anita James was copied into a message suggesting that the Solicitor's Division held a copy of some ACVSB files. However, she did not remember what she did about it, and said that she did not authorise a thorough search of the documents at that stage.

  • Read more about Anita James was copied into a message suggesting that the Solicitor's Division held a copy of some ACVSB files. However, she did not remember what she did about it, and said that she did not authorise a thorough search of the documents at that stage.

During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she did not know why Dr Metters had not been approached for his files much earlier and at the time the GEB/1 files were identified as missing.

  • Read more about During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she did not know why Dr Metters had not been approached for his files much earlier and at the time the GEB/1 files were identified as missing.

During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she had no recollection of what happened to the publications listed and attached to the main statement of claim in the HIV litigation.

  • Read more about During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she had no recollection of what happened to the publications listed and attached to the main statement of claim in the HIV litigation.

Anita James did not recall receiving reports sent to her by Dr Rejman in June 1995, nor how they came to be mislaid.

  • Read more about Anita James did not recall receiving reports sent to her by Dr Rejman in June 1995, nor how they came to be mislaid.

During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she had not retrieved the HIV litigation files sitting in the Solicitor's Division earlier because she "knew they were there" but was busy and "never thought to look at them".

  • Read more about During her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Anita James stated that she had not retrieved the HIV litigation files sitting in the Solicitor's Division earlier because she "knew they were there" but was busy and "never thought to look at them".

Anita James was satisfied that she had provided all relevant documents to Counsel when seeking advice, but does not recall why she was satisfied.

  • Read more about Anita James was satisfied that she had provided all relevant documents to Counsel when seeking advice, but does not recall why she was satisfied.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 172
  • Page 173
  • Page 174
  • Page 175
  • Current page 176
  • Page 177
  • Page 178
  • Page 179
  • Page 180
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to

Inquiry

  • Home
  • About
  • Approach
  • Participate
  • News
  • Evidence
  • Support
  • Get in touch

Legal

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility tool

Address

Infected Blood Inquiry
5th Floor
Aldwych House
71-91 Aldwych
London
WC2B 4HN
 
Images of individuals on the website are used with the agreement of those featured or are stock images.

Follow us

© Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.