Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation Hide — Main navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • The Chair
    • Inquiry Team
    • Expert Groups
    • Inquiry Intermediaries
    • Core Participants
    • Legal Representatives
    • Financial Reports
  • Approach
    • Terms of reference
    • List of Issues
    • Statements of approach
    • Inquiry Principles
  • News
    • News
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Reports
    • Compensation Framework Study
    • First Interim Report
    • Second Interim Report
    • The Inquiry Report
  • Publication Day
  • Evidence
    • Evidence
    • Hearings Archive
  • Compensation
  • Support
    • Confidential Psychological Support
    • Interim Payments
    • Support Groups
    • Get in touch
    • Infected Blood Support Schemes
    • Treatment and aftercare
    • Medical Evidence
    • Expenses Guidance
Accessibility Tool
  • Zoom in
  • Zoom out
  • Reset
  • Contrast
  • Accessibility tool
Get in touch

Quick Exit

Malcolm Chisholm was asked by the Health and Community Care Committee when he would be able to comment on whether further evidence provided by campaigners was sufficient to hold a public inquiry.

  • Read more about Malcolm Chisholm was asked by the Health and Community Care Committee when he would be able to comment on whether further evidence provided by campaigners was sufficient to hold a public inquiry.

Bob Stock told the Department of Health in England that he anticipated demands for a public inquiry would be renewed with support from the Scottish Parliament.

  • Read more about Bob Stock told the Department of Health in England that he anticipated demands for a public inquiry would be renewed with support from the Scottish Parliament.

In Scotland, the line to take asserted that there was no reason to believe anyone had acted wrongly and that a public inquiry would be a difficult, lengthy and expensive process.

  • Read more about In Scotland, the line to take asserted that there was no reason to believe anyone had acted wrongly and that a public inquiry would be a difficult, lengthy and expensive process.

In Scotland, the line to take was to refer to the Executive's internal report and confirm that a public inquiry was not believed to be in the interest of those involved.

  • Read more about In Scotland, the line to take was to refer to the Executive's internal report and confirm that a public inquiry was not believed to be in the interest of those involved.

The government line remained that no wrongful practices had been employed and there was no justification for a public inquiry.

  • Read more about The government line remained that no wrongful practices had been employed and there was no justification for a public inquiry.

DHSC and Lord Warner consistently said the Government's line was that a public inquiry was not justified in response to Lord Morris' Parliamentary question.

  • Read more about DHSC and Lord Warner consistently said the Government's line was that a public inquiry was not justified in response to Lord Morris' Parliamentary question.

William Connon wrote to Sir Nigel Crisp confirming the UK government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

  • Read more about William Connon wrote to Sir Nigel Crisp confirming the UK government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

John Reid wrote to Andy Kerr confirming that the UK government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

  • Read more about John Reid wrote to Andy Kerr confirming that the UK government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

Following a request from Scottish officials, William Connon confirmed the government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

  • Read more about Following a request from Scottish officials, William Connon confirmed the government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

Melanie Johnson, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health, wrote that the government did not employ any wrongful practices and that a public inquiry was not justified.

  • Read more about Melanie Johnson, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health, wrote that the government did not employ any wrongful practices and that a public inquiry was not justified.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 358
  • Page 359
  • Page 360
  • Page 361
  • Current page 362
  • Page 363
  • Page 364
  • Page 365
  • Page 366
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to

Inquiry

  • Home
  • About
  • Approach
  • Participate
  • News
  • Evidence
  • Support
  • Get in touch

Legal

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility tool

Address

Infected Blood Inquiry
5th Floor
Aldwych House
71-91 Aldwych
London
WC2B 4HN
 
Images of individuals on the website are used with the agreement of those featured or are stock images.

Follow us

© Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.