Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation Hide — Main navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • The Chair
    • Inquiry Team
    • Expert Groups
    • Inquiry Intermediaries
    • Core Participants
    • Legal Representatives
    • Financial Reports
  • Approach
    • Terms of reference
    • List of Issues
    • Statements of approach
    • Inquiry Principles
  • News
    • News
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Reports
    • Compensation Framework Study
    • First Interim Report
    • Second Interim Report
    • The Inquiry Report
  • Publication Day
  • Evidence
    • Evidence
    • Hearings Archive
  • Compensation
  • Support
    • Confidential Psychological Support
    • Interim Payments
    • Support Groups
    • Get in touch
    • Infected Blood Support Schemes
    • Treatment and aftercare
    • Medical Evidence
    • Expenses Guidance
Accessibility Tool
  • Zoom in
  • Zoom out
  • Reset
  • Contrast
  • Accessibility tool
Get in touch

Quick Exit

During oral evidence to the Infected Blood Inquiry, Roger Evans incorrectly asserted that the Macfarlane Trust needed to obtain money (reserves) from the Department of Health. This was later corrected the following morning in oral evidence to the Inquiry.

  • Read more about During oral evidence to the Infected Blood Inquiry, Roger Evans incorrectly asserted that the Macfarlane Trust needed to obtain money (reserves) from the Department of Health. This was later corrected the following morning in oral evidence to the Inquiry.

When chair, Roger Evans, recognised that aspects of the system were "humiliating and intrusive" and "the whole thing was not the right way to go about it".

  • Read more about When chair, Roger Evans, recognised that aspects of the system were "humiliating and intrusive" and "the whole thing was not the right way to go about it".

There was enough dissatisfaction with the process among beneficiaries that it reached Ailsa Wight at the Department of Health who referred to it in an email to Roger Evans.

  • Read more about There was enough dissatisfaction with the process among beneficiaries that it reached Ailsa Wight at the Department of Health who referred to it in an email to Roger Evans.

Roger Evans stated in his oral evidence that the NSSC had become bureaucratic in its approach to assessing applications. He described the NSSC as having introduced some of its own criteria to the decision-making process.

  • Read more about Roger Evans stated in his oral evidence that the NSSC had become bureaucratic in its approach to assessing applications. He described the NSSC as having introduced some of its own criteria to the decision-making process.

The adoption of "exceptional circumstances" as the principal criterion for assessing grant applications occurred without first seeking approval from the board and "exceptional circumstances" were never precisely defined.

  • Read more about The adoption of "exceptional circumstances" as the principal criterion for assessing grant applications occurred without first seeking approval from the board and "exceptional circumstances" were never precisely defined.

When chair, Roger Evans had concerns over beneficiaries being essentially subjected to a means test.

  • Read more about When chair, Roger Evans had concerns over beneficiaries being essentially subjected to a means test.

Roger Evans understood that it was suggested photographs of beneficiaries' homes should be taken.

  • Read more about Roger Evans understood that it was suggested photographs of beneficiaries' homes should be taken.

In evidence, Roger Evans could not remember whether the Department of Health had requested or instructed the board to make an allocation from reserves below the level at which the programme of expenditure from reserves had been set.

  • Read more about In evidence, Roger Evans could not remember whether the Department of Health had requested or instructed the board to make an allocation from reserves below the level at which the programme of expenditure from reserves had been set.

In evidence, Roger Evans accepted that some amongst the beneficiary community would have thought that due to his attitude and approach the Trust was too close to the Department of Health.

  • Read more about In evidence, Roger Evans accepted that some amongst the beneficiary community would have thought that due to his attitude and approach the Trust was too close to the Department of Health.

Roger Evans' view expressed to the Inquiry was that there were ways of getting what you wanted from the Department and its ministers, and ways to which they would not respond.

  • Read more about Roger Evans' view expressed to the Inquiry was that there were ways of getting what you wanted from the Department and its ministers, and ways to which they would not respond.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 719
  • Page 720
  • Page 721
  • Page 722
  • Current page 723
  • Page 724
  • Page 725
  • Page 726
  • Page 727
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to

Inquiry

  • Home
  • About
  • Approach
  • Participate
  • News
  • Evidence
  • Support
  • Get in touch

Legal

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility tool

Address

Infected Blood Inquiry
5th Floor
Aldwych House
71-91 Aldwych
London
WC2B 4HN
 
Images of individuals on the website are used with the agreement of those featured or are stock images.

Follow us

© Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.