Subscribe to Search results

A briefing from Charles Lister, Department of Health, to Lord Philip Hunt, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health in the House of Lords, on Hepatitis C litigation key findings, noted that there were legitimate expectations that surrogate testing and anti-Hepatitis C screening should had been introduced earlier.

Published on:

Charles Lister, Department of Health, recommended to Lord Philip Hunt, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health in the House of Lords, that the court judgment in the "A and Others v National Blood Authority" should not be appealed.

Published on:

An email from Christine Dora to Mairi Gibson and others indicated that Officials in Scotland were keen on an appeal against the court judgment in "A and Others v National Blood Authority".

Published on:

Dr Aileen Keel regarded the Department of Health's decision not to appeal in "A and Others v National Blood Authority" as "lamentable".

Published on:

In his letter to Susan Deacon MSP, Minister for Health and Community Care, Philip Hunt, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health in the House of Lords, noted the decision of the ministers not to appeal in "A and Others v National Blood Authority", although with some reluctance.

Published on:

John Hutton told the Parliament that "as soon as technology became available to render blood products safe, it was introduced."

Published on:

A draft speech on Hepatitis C prepared by officials for the Parliament Adjournment Debate asserted that: "The technology to make blood products free from hepatitis C in sufficient quantities to treat all haemophiliacs in the UK was simply not possible prior to 1985. Once it was the NHS introduced it."

Published on:

In preparation for a meeting with the Minister of Health, Vicki King sent a draft speech on Hepatitis C for the Adjournment Debate to Jane Colman._

Published on:

Carol Grayson wrote to Baroness Andrews pointing out "the whole-blood hepatitis C cases that were won where the judge stated that testing/screening of blood donors for hepatitis C should have been introduced prior to 1991, and that the country should have acted as other European countries did and adopted testing earlier, erring on the side of caution even if there were some false positive test results".

Published on:

Richard Gutowski, in his statement to the Inquiry, recognised that the lines to take drafted for the Government relating to donor screening for Hepatitis C could have better reflected the findings of the Court in "A & others [2001] EWHC QB 446".

Published on:

A brief by Scottish Executive officials stated, in relation to the introduction of Hepatitis C screening in 1991, that this development was introduced as early as it reasonably could be in the light of the scientific knowledge and technical capabilities at that time.

Published on:

An update for the Secretary of State dated 29 March 2005 emphasised that donor screening for Hepatitis C was introduced in the UK in 1991 and the development of this test marked a major advance in microbiological technology, which could not have been implemented before this time.

Published on:

The Secretary of State for Health, Lord John Reid, wrote to Andy Kerr, repeating the line regarding introduction of the donor screening for Hepatitis C in the UK in 1991 in the context of the Government's position that a public inquiry was not justified.

Published on:

In his written statement to the Inquiry Lord Reid noted that the wording of his letter to Andrew Kerr was based on the briefing received by officials and agreed that the line was 'simply inaccurate'.

Published on:

In his oral evidence to the Inquiry, Lord John Reid acknowledged that it was accurate to say that Hepatitis C screening could have been introduced earlier than 1991, although he did not have knowledge of this at the time.

Published on:

In her letter to Nick Harvey MP, Caroline Flint, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health, repeated the line that Hepatitis C Screening could not have been introduced sooner and that a public inquiry was not justified.

Published on:

Responding to Carol Grayson, the Department of Health's Customer Service Directorate asserted that donor screening for Hepatitis C "could not have been implemented" before 1991.

Published on:

Lord Warner, speaking in the House of Lords, claimed that "the infection of people with hepatitis C was inadvertent. Nothing could have been done at the time with the technology available to assess the blood for that level of infection."

Published on:

Caroline Flint, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health, repeated in a letter to the Haemophilia Society that "Donor screening for hepatitis C was introduced in the UK in 1991 and the development of this test marked a major advance in microbiological technology, which could not have been implemented before this time."

Published on:

The press release, related to the the report on self-sufficiency in blood products in England and Wales, stated that "The review based on the available evidence, concludes that clinicians acted in the best interest of their patients in the light of the evidence available at the time. Donor screening for hepatitis C was introduced in the UK in 1991 and the development of this test marked a major advance in technology, which could not have been implemented before this time."

Published on: