Subscribe to Search results

When asked about undertaking a review similar to the Hillsborough Independent Panel, Theresa May told Diana Johnson that she would "take it away and consider it."

Published on:

Diana Johnson wrote to the Prime Minister contesting the claim that an inquiry would further delay action to address concerns

Published on:

Jeremy Hunt wrote to Diana Johnson suggesting that an independent panel would not improve current knowledge about how infections happened

Published on:

The Daily Mail's front page reported the Group Litigation Order that Collins Solicitors had applied for

Published on:

The Department of Health's Infected Blood Policy Team recommended that the Government announce its intention to hold a public inquiry

Published on:

Jeremy Hunt informed the Prime Minister that he was minded to hold an inquiry

Published on:

The Cabinet Office lines to take following the announcement of the Infected Blood Inquiry included that the Government recognised previous inquiries and document releases had not gone far enough to provide answers

Published on:

The line to take on a public inquiry in Wales followed that of the Department of Health

Published on:

A letter from an official within the Welsh Health Services Division explained that the decision not to pursue a public inquiry was made in consultation with officials and health professionals.

Published on:

Referring to the ongoing refusal to hold a public inquiry, Jane Hutt responded that because it was a global problem linked to the development of science and technology a public inquiry would not provide a satisfactory answer.

Published on:

Jane Hutt's statement in relation to the insufficiency of a public inquiry appeared in a paper prepared for the Health and Social Services Committee for its meeting.

Published on:

Caroline Lewis was provided with a Q&A document in advance of a meeting with representatives of Haemophilia Wales.

Published on:

The Q&A document provided by David Reay to Caroline Lewis confirmed that the Government did not accept any wrongful practices were employed and did not consider a public inquiry justified.

Published on:

Jane Hutt wrote to campaigner Haydn Lewis stating that all the information available was already in the public domain and a public inquiry would not provide any additional information

Published on:

Haydn Lewis wrote to Jane Hutt asking all Assembly members to support the request for a full public inquiry

Published on:

The Welsh Assembly Government asserted that it did not believe there were any lessons to be learned that had not already been learned, and that no available evidence indicated anyone in Wales had acted wrongly

Published on:

At a meeting between officials of the three administrations, William Connon requested Scottish ministers liaise with ministers and special advisers in other administrations before any decision was taken to hold a public inquiry.

Published on:

In a short debate in the Welsh Assembly on Hepatitis C, John Griffiths confirmed that the Welsh Assembly Government's position remained that there was no need for a public inquiry

Published on:

Assembly Member Jenny Randerson sought to persuade the Minister, Caroline Flint, that a national inquiry should be held on behalf of some of her constituents.

Published on:

Caroline Flint responded to Jenny Randerson confirming that the Government did not accept any wrongful practices had been employed and did not consider a public inquiry was justified.

Published on: