Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Inquiry Memorial
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
The Inquiry Report
Additional Compensation Report
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
Compensation Framework Study
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Support and FAQs
NHS Psychological Support
Support Groups
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Hepatitis C Testing
Contact us
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
In his statement to the Inquiry, Laurence George stated that it was not custom and practice within internal audits to interview staff who had retired or left the Department.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita James provided an update to the Minister, Tom Sackville, and reported that Dr Rejman had "sent me a list of documents covering the three years [1989-1991]. They run into some 14 volumes."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In her statement to the Inquiry, Anita James was unable to recall if 14 volumes of documents covering the years 1989 to 1991 were ever provided to her by Dr Rejman.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita James moved departments and handed over to Ruth McEwan. Her reasons for leaving were significant issues at work in terms of workload and bullying by her manager.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita James was referring to both HIV litigation files and ACVSB minutes in GEB/1, when referring to litigation files she had searched for in relation to another case but subsequently found they were destroyed.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita Jones described haphazard file keeping in SOLB4 within the Solicitor's Division in her written statement, with files being kept in rooms and papers not being put in registered files.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita Jones stated that when it emerged in early 2000 that files were missing, she had "entirely forgotten" that there had been a minute nearly 5 years earlier from Dr Rejman where he mentioned the destruction of folders.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Rejman held files relating to HCV and haemophilia litigation which he had sent to Anita James.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In relation to documents that Anita James was seeking in order to deal with hepatitis litigation, Dr Rejman stated that as agreed, he did not intend to go through the full discovery list prepared at the time.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita James acknowledged that it should have been ensured that files were retained. She regretted that she "did not act so as [to] make sure that other files which had been marked for destruction were not in fact destroyed."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita James stated that she was "having to endure a working environment which by today's standards would be viewed as entirely unacceptable." She recalled "finding it difficult even simply to go to work."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
It was highlighted that in the UK there were delays introducing screening from mid 1990 well into 1991.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Ruth McEwen told Anita James that she had spoken to David Burrage "who asserts that...all relevant files were located together in one filing cabinet. So if any is now missing he cannot account for either why that should be or the possible location."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Rejman continued to object to further work being undertaken on discovery of documents because it was "wholly inappropriate and wasteful of resources ... until we [are] certain that something would come of the HCV haemophilia case."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
The other GEB/1 files were not destroyed until between October 1997 and November 1998
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Yvonne de Sampayo stated in that she was: "particularly shocked to see reference to the suggestion that I destroyed documents because I was fearful of a difficult disclosure process due to a supposed bad experience with the BSE inquiry's disclosure process."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Yvonne de Sampayo denied destroying any of Dr Metters' papers and said that they would have remained in the filing cabinets as it was not in her remit to make decisions about the retention of files.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Metters was described as meticulous, and had kept substantial records.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
The Department of Health were notified of a draft application for third party disclosure of documents by the claimants in the Hepatitis C litigation.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
There was a draft court order in the case of "A and Others v National Blood Authority" which permitted the Department of Health employees to inspect and take copies of documentation relating to HCV screening, minutes of the Advisory Committee, minutes of the National Blood Transfusion Service/National Institute of Biological Standards and Controls Liaison Committee.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2279
Page
2280
Page
2281
Page
2282
Current page
2283
Page
2284
Page
2285
Page
2286
Page
2287
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last