Subscribe to Search results

The "Expert Report to the Infected Blood Inquiry: Statistics" was produced, noting the statistic that no new case of vCJD has been identified since 2016.

Published on:

SEAC considered the results of two studies in "Nature" (in advance of their publication at the start of October 1997) and became convinced that the evidence of the link between BSE and vCJD had become "compelling".

Published on:

A review of three studies conducted between 1995 and 2014 of the prevalence with which abnormal prion proteins seen in samples of appendices removed at operation (hence "appendix studies", as they are known) found that 1 in 2,000 of the population had abnormal prion protein in their appendix.

Published on:

Mr AN told the Inquiry of having to insist upon procedures being carried out in the face of unwillingness from clinicians, and of then being made to wait around until the end of the patient list before being seen, and of having had procedures cancelled on the basis that there was no suitable equipment available.

Published on:

Morwenna Carrington told the Inquiry about reasons given by the Department of Health as to why a product was not adopted by the NHS in 2007 "as it did not achieve a category 1 rating from the RRP [Rapid Review Panel]. All manufacturers of products are required to have a category 1 rating to be suitable for the NHS. Other manufacturers developing similar pre-soaks also did not achieve a category 1 rating from the RRP and were not recommended for use in the NHS."

Published on:

NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence published the article "Patient safety and reduction of risk of transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) via interventional procedures".

Published on:

"Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Agents: Safe Working and the Prevention of Infection" was published as an annex - this guidance made it clear that patient care should not be prejudiced as a result of the procedures to be followed in identifying patients at an increased risk of vCJD.

Published on:

A briefing paper for the Lord President of the Privy Council commented that the Social Services Secretary now proposed a one-off grant of up to £10 million to the Haemophilia Society to be distributed to cases of need.

Published on:

John Major wrote to Tony Newton, concerned about the precedent and recommending that the government "listen only at this stage" to the Haemophilia Society with regard to compensation for people with haemophilia who had been infected with HIV, "with no implication that the Government will take action."

Published on:

A handwritten note on a copy of Tony Newton's minute on compensation for people with haemophilia stated "Prime Minister! This is a major about-turn. Content?"

Published on:

A minute from John O'Sullivan (an adviser in Number 10) to the Prime Minister expressed agreement with the drift of Tony Newton's memorandum on compensation for people with haemophilia.

Published on:

In his reply to a parliamentary question asking when the DHSS had first become aware of AIDS and that AIDS was sexually transmitted, and could be transmitted through blood and blood products, Tony Newton stated: "Evidence that the AIDS infection could also be transmitted by blood transfusion emerged from the United States of America in 1983."

Published on:

In his reply to a parliamentary question on whether the Secretary of State would take steps to compensate those with haemophilia who had been infected with AIDS by Factor 8 imported from the US, Tony Newton undertook to give an answer as soon as possible.

Published on:

The House of Commons Social Services Committee's report noted the Government's position but suggested that "Calls for compensation for haemophiliacs and others who have become HIV positive as a consequence of infected blood transfusions and for special life insurance arrangements for haemophiliacs deserve careful consideration."

Published on:

In a letter to Anthony Nelson, Baroness Trumpington stated that "Doctors treating haemophiliacs were, we believe, careful in explaining these risks to their patients'.

Published on:

A briefing note for an interview with "The Northern Echo" prepared by Dr Moore, a civil servant in a policy division within the DHSS, continued the line of there never having been a state scheme to compensate those who suffer the unavoidable adverse effects which may arise from some medical procedures and that compensation could only be awarded by the courts when negligence had been proved.

Published on:

In a briefing for the CMO's visit to Newcastle regarding haemophilia issues, it used the line "there has never been a general state scheme in this country to compensate those who suffer the unavoidable adverse effects which may arise from some medical procedures."

Published on:

In a memo to Malcolm Harris, Dr Alison Smithies provided information to colleagues regarding compensation for people with haemophilia and described their situation as "pitiful" and "attracting a great deal of sympathy particularly due to the perceived stigma of the disease".

Published on:

In a minute sent from Tony Newton to the Prime Minister referring to John Moore's minute of 24 September, he recognised a "powerful practical case" for recognising the circumstances of "infected haemophiliacs" and that there was very strong support for their campaign, particularly from their own supporters inside and outside the house.

Published on:

Secretary of State for Health and Social Services, John Moore, stated that his initial reaction was that it would be most unwise to make the "further look" into the case of people with haemophilia public.

Published on: