Subscribe to Search results

In the Haemophilia Society submission, a member mentioned the lacking of the Government in apologising for the "catastrophic effect on the lives of innocent and vulnerable people".

Published on:

In an interview between Lynda Finn and Dr Christine Lee, Dr Lee stated that she did not believe faults could be attributed and cynically, she thought that "the few patients driving this" were probably after money.

Published on:

In his written statement, Peter Burney commented how governments had let their citizens down by not keeping them safe and and that the government should at the very least, let every victim know that if anything happens to them their family's future was financially secure.

Published on:

Mrs U informed the inquiry that Dr Ludlam told her that her husband had contracted AIDS before his death and that she would have to be tested for AIDS which she subsequently was and was found not to have been infected with HIV.

Published on:

The Death Certificate of Mrs U's husband showed the cause of death to be acute myeloid leukaemia.

Published on:

In his written statement, Andrew March commented that it was unacceptable that individuals like himself who had been infected or affected by the contaminated blood scandal had to become researchers/campaigners in order to try and establish what happened and to reach the point of finally achieving a public inquiry and how this had adversely affected his life.

Published on:

In her written statement, Jackie Britton described how "the contaminated blood scandal hangs over me every day" and that campaigning "does take its toll."

Published on:

In his written statement, the father of a son infected with Hepatitis C stated that the NHS felt like a "closed shop" and that no one knew what was going on and nobody would take responsibility for what had happened.

Published on:

Two brothers who would die only months apart, Haydn and Gareth Lewis, were spurred on by the death of seven-year-old Colin Smith in 1990 to find out what had happened and why.

Published on:

In his written statement, Professor Ludlam stated he only learned in 1986 that Mrs U's husband had been infected with HIV from transfusion but he decided not to tell her on the basis of a "risk assessment" that the chance of her being infected with HIV was very small. It was, however, probable, because it would have been his "standard practice", that he shared this information with the GP.

Published on:

Professor Turner, on behalf of SNBTS, confirmed in a statement to the Inquiry that Mrs U's husband had received a platelet transfusion and that following the introduction of HIV donor testing in 1985 the donor was identified as being HIV positive when donating. Mrs U's husband was found to have received an infected platelet transfusion during the subsequent lookback process and Dr Gillon informed Professor Ludlam of this.

Published on:

In his written evidence, Lord Waldegrave stated that: "The change of position in 1992 on payments to individuals infected with HIV through blood or tissue transfer reflected "combined increased pressure in Parliament...from the media campaign and from allied correspondence".

Published on:

Susan Douglas, a journalist who had written the article "Hospitals using killer blood" on 1 May 1983 in the "Mail on Sunday", stated she had spoken to a clinician in Cardiff and was unable to recall the name of her source. In his written statement, Dr Whittaker stated that her contact was "almost certainly Professor Allan Jacobs".

Published on:

In its closing submission, the Department of Health and Social Care stated that "DHSC ministers and the wider Government will, in due course, react to the Inquiry's findings and recommendations but it has not wished to pre-empt that process by offering opinions now."

Published on:

The Medical Ethics Expert Group, said that when harm befalls a person, there were, from an ethical perspective, three particularly important factors: (i) responsibility must be attributed; (ii) openness and transparency are needed; and (iii) recognition is required so that those responsible for the harm can understand its nature and the impact it will have had.

Published on:

Giving evidence as part of the Medical Ethics Expert Panel, Professor Farsides stated that "we won't learn the proper facts of the matter if people are being defensive or hiding things or even not taking it seriously enough to dig down and find the important information", with Professor Kerridge adding that "these same principles apply in areas of politics."

Published on:

Speaking about a cover-up, Mrs AJ, giving evidence, said: "If this had happened on one day, if a plane had dropped out of the sky killing everyone on board (only in this case it would have been six planes) or if a liner had hit an iceberg (in this case it would have been two liners), something would have been done immediately."

Published on:

Professor Savidge attributed the failures to effect self-sufficiency and eliminate viral contamination to poor leadership assuming safety of BPL products and a lack of political will to spearhead essential changes that were evident by 1978.

Published on:

In a letter, Clive Collins updated A Woodhead at the DHSS regarding the situation of a donor infected with HIV in the US with this infected batch being distributed to centres in the UK.

Published on:

A potentially infected Armour batch was not reported to the DHSS. The letter concerned the follow up of a potentially contaminated batch of Factorate before it was removed from the market

Published on: