Subscribe to Search results

The functions and purposes of a public inquiry were described in a report of the Public Administration Select Committee.

Published on:

Mike Deegan from the Manchester Royal Infirmary wrote a letter to an Inquiry witness providing the results of an investigation about a complaint made about the treatment provided to the witness' brother.

Published on:

A complaint by Khalid Mahmood regarding the care and treatment provided to his late wife for liver disease was partially upheld by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.

Published on:

Raymond Wildsmith from the CPS provided an advice statement regarding the treatment of people with haemophilia. He advised that while any investigation would have significant difficulties he had identified possible criminal offences.

Published on:

Detective Chief Inspector Linda Little stated in a memo that there was no evidence that a specific group of people with haemophilia were deliberately infected with contaminated Factor 8 at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

Published on:

Carol Grayson, Colette Wintle and others made a complaint to the Metropolitan Police regarding the infection of people with haemophilia with contaminated blood products.

Published on:

Professor Charles Vincent, giving evidence as part of the Public Health and Administration Expert Group, observed that "for instance, there are multiple ways of raising concerns in the NHS but it's quite hard to know where you want to go ... It works very variably.

Published on:

Stephen Heath in his statement to the Inquiry described the report on supply of blood products to people with haemophilia in Scotland as a "scoping exercise"; it was not his role to decide whether an investigation should be undertaken, although it was his personal view that the issues merited a criminal investigation.

Published on:

Carol Grayson, who complained to the GMC in February 2003 regarding Dr Peter Jones' testing and treatment of her husband Pete Longstaff, stated "that Dr Jones was privy to all our allegations but his responses to them were not disclosed to us throughout the course of the complaint."

Published on:

J E Lewis, Detective Chief Superintendent (CPS) wrote a letter to Carol Grayson in relation to criminal offences considered by the Crown Prosecution, enclosing a summary of those offences.

Published on:

Mike Hughes emailed Simon Powell, Detective Chief Inspector, forwarding an email from Carol Grayson to Mark Bleasdale regarding testing patients without permission / withholding results of tests.

Published on:

Carol Grayson sent a letter to Detective Inspector Mark Bleasdale at Northumbria Police regarding people with haemophilia being tested for Hepatitis C without their knowledge or consent.

Published on:

Chief Constable Terence Grange sent a letter to Jim Cousins MP regarding haemophilia testing without permission.

Published on:

Peter Mossman sent a letter to the Chief Constable at Greater Manchester Police in relation to an investigation into the gross negligence with regards to blood safety issues

Published on:

Ann Hume told the Inquiry that she never received a conclusive diagnosis: she was first diagnosed as having hereditary haemorrhagic disorder, then told she had Haemophilia B and later that she had von Willebrand disorder, although both these diagnoses were later discredited.

Published on:

Jill Stewart, Complaints Investigator at Scottish Public Services Ombudsman sent a letter to Ann Hume regarding her complaint against an NHS Board in relation to her being given Factor 8 which led to infection with Hepatitis C. It was decided that further action would not be taken.

Published on:

"Mark" told the Inquiry that he made a complaint to the GMC regarding Professor Christopher Ludlam in June 2005.

Published on:

Ann Abraham, Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, wrote to Jennifer Willott MP in relation to Haydn Lewis' complaint against the Department of Health.

Published on:

The GMC told this Inquiry that the question of consent was raised in the majority of the complaints it received against clinicians in relation to infections caused by blood transfusion or blood products.

Published on:

There were delays of up to 18 months between a decision by the Screeners to refer the case to the Preliminary Proceedings Committee and then a decision by the Case Examiners to close the case in the GMC complaint process.

Published on: