Subscribe to Search results

A flood damaged a substantial amount of microfilmed medical records held by the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

Published on:

There was a flood in the Manchester Royal Infirmary.

Published on:

There was a fire in the Blood Transfusion Laboratory at the Trafford General Hospital which resulted in all paper records there being destroyed.

Published on:

Edward Massey was told that most of his records had been destroyed at the Manchester Royal Infirmary in a flood. He also applied to the Lancashire and South Cumbria Agency for his records and was told that they too had been destroyed.

Published on:

Professor Jane Eddleston was unable to confirm whether a flood at the Manchester Royal Infirmary had caused the destruction of records before 1986, although one staff member recalled a flood damaging the Infirmary's medical records library.

Published on:

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust was able to provide retention policies from 1999 onwards.

Published on:

Richard Raymond requested his wife's medical records but was told that they had been destroyed in a sewage leak at St Mary's Hospital in 2003 and was then later told that records were routinely destroyed after 15 years.

Published on:

The Trust told the inquiry that whilst a flood may have occurred at St Mary's Hospital, corporate records were only retained for 7 to 10 years so there was no information available.

Published on:

In his written statement, Alasdair Cameron stated that no medical records were available from the time of his operation, records were poorly stored in Scotland and it was believed they were "routinely destroyed after a set period".

Published on:

Sometimes documents recording environmental incidents have themselves been destroyed under retention policies.

Published on:

A man's request to "expunge" incorrect information in his medical records was granted.

Published on:

A witness' son's medical records contain no information about when he was tested for, diagnosed with or informed of his HIV infection.

Published on:

The impression was given that a witness' Hepatitis C was due to alcohol use, regardless of the accuracy of this.

Published on:

A witness' husband was labelled an alcoholic due to his Hepatitis C infection.

Published on:

A letter sent to a witness' husband's GP suggested he drank alcohol.

Published on:

A witness was shocked at the mention of excessive alcohol in her husband's medical notes. It did not ring true to her.

Published on:

Doctors have generally responded to criticism regarding the accuracy of notes concerning a patient's alcohol consumption by defending their records as being an accurate representation of what they were told.

Published on:

A witness had no medical records relating to a period in hospital after a road traffic accident when he required the insertion of a metal plate into his ankle.

Published on:

A witness recalled her husband attending an appointment where he was told he did not have AIDS and then attending a week later to be told by Dr Peter Kernoff that he was in fact infected. Neither appointment appeared in his medical records.

Published on:

A witness had two pages missing from his records relating to surgery at the North Middlesex Hospital after which he had required multiple blood transfusions._

Published on: