Subscribe to Search results

Professor John Cash wrote to Dr Jeremy Metters requesting the ACVSB to consider a lookback policy.

Published on:

The ACTTD agreed that "there may be an ethical obligation to inform patients who may have received transfusions in the past from anti-HCV donations."

Published on:

The ACVSB recommended that lookback should not be undertaken as a service, leaving the option for those carrying out research.

Published on:

The ACTTD agreed that lookback may have legal implications and should be considered.

Published on:

The UK began screening blood donations for Hepatitis C.

Published on:

A lookback began in Edinburgh and South East Scotland as a "pilot study".

Published on:

The Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service Medical and Scientific Committee recommended the implementation of a lookback policy without delay.

Published on:

An ad-hoc assembly of experts convened on behalf of the SACTTI acknowledged that the Blood Transfusion Service had an ethical responsibility and duty of care towards recipients of potentially infectious blood components.

Published on:

The results of Dr John Gillon's lookback study were published.

Published on:

The MSBT advised ministers to undertake a lookback programme.

Published on:

The MSBT's advice to undertake a lookback programme was presented to ministers in a ministerial submission.

Published on:

The Minister for Home Affairs and Health from the Scottish Office wrote to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health about the lookback exercise, stating that as a matter of legal liability the lookback should take place as soon as possible in Scotland.

Published on:

The Health Minister agreed to the recommended Hepatitis C lookback exercise.

Published on:

The UK-wide Hepatitis C lookback programme was announced to Parliament.

Published on:

The UK-wide Hepatitis C lookback programme began.

Published on:

First public statement from the Government rejecting calls for compensation.

Published on:

The Northern Echo began a campaign for compensation.

Published on:

The Government maintained that there would be no state compensation.

Published on:

Secretary of State sought legal advice as to the possible liability of the NHS.

Published on:

Tony Newton gave evidence to the House of Commons Social Services Committee maintaining the position of no scheme to compensate for "unavoidable adverse effects" of medical treatment.

Published on: