Subscribe to Search results

In a formal minute to Alan Johnson, Dawn Primarolo noted that the package of measures proposed in response to Lord Archer's recommendations would not entirely satisfy Lord Archer and his supporters.

Published on:

The Secretary of State annotated the minute from Dawn Primarolo agreeing to the proposed package of measures commenting that it was a good outcome "if not all that Lord A would want."

Published on:

In his written statement to the Inquiry, Alan Johnson said that he responded to Dawn Primarolo's minute regarding the measures proposed in response to Lord Archer's recommendations with "Agreed. Good outcome if not all that Lord A would want".

Published on:

In his written evidence to the Inquiry, Alan Johnson stated that in saying he needed to be convinced, he was not ruling out increased funding but "sounding a note of caution" in the context of a difficult financial climate.

Published on:

In his written evidence to the Inquiry, Alan Johnson stated he recognised that aspects of the Department of Health's response would not go as far as the infected, their supporters or Lord Archer would have liked but that there was an exceptionally difficult economic climate at the time.

Published on:

Dawn Primarolo wrote to Lord Archer notifying him that the Government's formal report in response to his Inquiry was being published that day.

Published on:

Dawn Primarolo wrote to Lord Morris of Manchester notifying him that the Government's response to Lord Archer's report was being published that day.

Published on:

Dawn Primarolo wrote to Mr Chris James notifying him that the Government's response to Lord Archer's report was being published that day.

Published on:

Dawn Primarolo wrote to Mr Eddie O'Hara MP notifying him that the Government's response to Lord Archer's report was being published that day.

Published on:

The Government's formal report in response to the Archer Inquiry was published with a written ministerial statement.

Published on:

The Government issued a press release to announce their response to the Archer Inquiry into individuals infected by HIV and Hepatitis C through NHS blood and blood products.

Published on:

The Q&A briefing on the Archer report on Contaminated Blood gave a proposed answer to a question on the comparison of payments made in Northern Ireland and that the situation in the UK was different.

Published on:

Alan Johnson, the Secretary of State for Health, published a brief on the Government's response to the Archer Inquiry for the Parliamentary Labour Party.

Published on:

The approach to communicating the Government's response was planned and circulated in submissions pertaining to the publication arrangements of Lord Archer's report.

Published on:

A Department of Health media handling plan was circulated regarding the Government's response to the Archer Inquiry.

Published on:

A further submission to the Minister of State for Public Health was circulated requesting approval for a written ministerial statement on Lord Archer's report into contaminated blood and blood products.

Published on:

A written ministerial statement was published along with the Government's formal report in response to the Archer Inquiry.

Published on:

Chris James, chief executive of the Haemophilia Society, issued a press release fiercely criticising the response to the Archer Inquiry.

Published on:

Lord Archer responded to the Government's response to and report regarding the Archer Inquiry in a letter to Dawn Primarolo.

Published on:

Dr Rowena Jecock and her team provided a briefing on "Government response to Lord Archer - next steps". This noted that the reaction to the package announced in response to the Archer report had been "limited, but negative."

Published on: