Subscribe to Search results

A letter from David Burrage to Charles Dobson outlined points on blood transfusion recipients for inclusion with the briefing for on HIV haemophilia.

Published on:

A response on behalf of the Chief Medical Officer noted that he would be concerned with "spread" to hepatitis cases of various sorts.

Published on:

"The Times" reported that a group of patients had joined an action group with a Merseyside solicitor involved in the HIV litigation, Graham Ross.

Published on:

The Government continued to give some consideration to the position of infected transfusion patients over subsequent months. On 31 May 1991 the Secretary of State was provided with a note on the subject for discussions with colleagues.

Published on:

A Department of Health note considered the pros and cons of extending payments to transfusion patients.

Published on:

The Government's position remained that it would not extend the payments given to people with haemophilia to transfusion patients.

Published on:

A memo from Strachan Heppell to Colin Phillips showed that the Secretary of State for Health supported extending payments to transfusion patients.

Published on:

A memo from Peter Kendall to Joan Firth showed that the Secretary of State for Health supported extending payments to transfusion patients.

Published on:

A memo from Joan Firth to Strachan Heppell showed that the Secretary of State for Health supported extending payments to transfusion patients.

Published on:

In a letter from Ian Lang to David Mellor, it was suggested that the Department pay a third of the cost of extending payments to transfusion patients, and that the other Health Departments make a contribution in respect of cases arising in their countries and that the Treasury meet the balance from the Reserve.

Published on:

In a letter from David Hunt to David Mellor, it was suggested that the Department pay a third of the cost of extending payments to transfusion patients, and that the other Health Departments make a contribution in respect of cases arising in their countries and that the Treasury meet the balance from the Reserve.

Published on:

Sir Christopher France wrote to Colin Phillips to support the misgivings about the proposed change of policy that had been expressed by Strachan Heppell.

Published on:

A memo from Baroness Hooper to the Secretary of State stated that the Department should hold the line, however difficult this may be.

Published on:

A memo from Rob Jex to Colin Phillips stated that MS(H) supported moves seeking a further extension given the current circumstances.

Published on:

A memo from Helen Bloomfield to Colin Phillips stated that PS(H) had commented "without enthusiasm" that he was in favour of extending the concession to blood transfusion.

Published on:

In a Hansard extract on compensation for people infected with HIV through contaminated blood, support for a change in the Government's position was again voiced by a number of MPs including Sir Michael McNair-Wilson MP.

Published on:

A "Notices of Motions" extract stated that there was no logical or legal argument for the Government's refusal to extend aid to people without haemophilia.

Published on:

Treasury officials described the then current justification for limiting financial support for people who had suffered HIV infection from treatment under the NHS to people with haemophilia as never having been convincing, they urged that there should be no extension.

Published on:

The Chief Secretary expressed that he had "serious reservations about whether it would be possible realistically to ring fence any such compensation" and commented that, by "compensating those acquiring HIV from blood transfusion, we will be taking a further long stride towards no-fault compensation in general."

Published on:

The Chief Secretary discussed whether it would be possible to ring-fence compensation.

Published on: