Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
Compensation Framework Study
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
The Inquiry Report
Publication Day
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Confidential Psychological Support
Interim Payments
Support Groups
Get in touch
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Treatment and aftercare
Medical Evidence
Expenses Guidance
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
A briefing provided for Alan Johnson, the Secretary of State for Health, and Dawn Primarolo asserted that "as soon as technologies (heat treatment and testing) were available to improve safety, they were introduced."
Published on:
09 August, 2024
A briefing from the Secretary of State's Office for the Parliamentary Labour Party asserted that "Action was taken as soon as possible to introduce testing and safety measures for blood and blood products as these became available."
Published on:
09 August, 2024
In his statement to the Inquiry, Alan Johnson acknowledged that the High Court's 2001 finding that the UK should have introduced screening or surrogate testing earlier should have been reflected in the briefing dated 27 May 2009.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
The Archer Report found that "The United Kingdom delayed testing until a specific test (as opposed to a surrogate test) became available. Even then, although such a test was in use in Japan in 1989, and in the USA, Australia and most European countries in 1990, the United Kingdom delayed introduction until the product had been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA, and it was not introduced into the United Kingdom until September 1991."
Published on:
09 August, 2024
In a letter to Lord Fraser QC, Tom Sackville at the Department of Health referred to those "inadvertently" infected with Hepatitis C through infected blood transfusions.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
A "Dear Doctor" letter from Dr Kenneth Calman referred to those "inadvertently" infected with Hepatitis C through infected blood transfusions.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
A "Hansard" written answer referred to those "inadvertently" infected with Hepatitis C through infected blood transfusions.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
A "Hansard" written answer used the line regarding "inadvertent" infection with Hepatitis C through blood transfusions.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
In a letter to Roddy Morrison, Melanie Johnson referred to those "inadvertently" infected with Hepatitis C through infected blood transfusions.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
In a letter to Lord Jenkin, Lord Warner referred to those who "inadvertently" contracted serious infections as a result of treatment.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
A Lord's Oral Questioning Briefing Pack suggested a following line: "Whilst successive Governments acted in good faith, the serious infections inadvertently contracted by these patients as a result of their treatment had tragic consequences, and we are deeply sorry that this happened".
Published on:
09 August, 2024
The 2002 "Hepatitis C Strategy for England" stated that some recipients of blood and blood products were "inadvertently infected".
Published on:
09 August, 2024
In his oral evidence to the Inquiry, Sir John Major noted that if he had been told that there were question marks about the best treatment available, or whether patients had been given proper information about risks, or whether there was a delay in the introduction of screening, he would have asked for more information.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
Lord Morris referred to the HIV and HCV infection among people with haemophilia as the gravest treatment disaster in the history of the NHS.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
A Haemophilia Society call for an inquiry into Hepatitis C infection of the UK haemophilia population referred to it as the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
Lord Morris further described the effects of contamination by blood products as part of the worst treatment disaster in the history of the National Health Service.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
On announcing the Inquiry the Prime Minister, Teresa May, called the contaminated blood scandal "an appalling tragedy which should simply never have happened", highlighting that patients were failed by the NHS.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
In his oral evidence to the inquiry, Lord Horam acknowledged that he was repeatedly briefed by civil servants that people had received the best available treatment at the time.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
Lord Clarke suggested in his evidence to the Inquiry that the best treatment available line would have been a reflection of the fact that more people would be damaged, and the quality of life of people with haemophilia very badly damaged, if they were not provided with the Factor 8.
Published on:
09 August, 2024
In his oral evidence to the Inquiry, Lord Horam acknowledged that he was repeatedly briefed by civil servants that people had received the best available treatment at the time.
Published on:
11 October, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2235
Page
2236
Page
2237
Page
2238
Current page
2239
Page
2240
Page
2241
Page
2242
Page
2243
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last