Subscribe to Search results

In a document entitled "Infected Blood: Parity of support across - UK" it was stated that the "Cabinet Office was keen for any announcements be made prior to the Infected Blood Inquiry resuming their gathering of evidence from 30 April 2019...And to make an announcement by 30 April, it was considered that we would not be able to address the cross-UK parity question within the time allowed."

Published on:

In an email from Tim Jones to Ailsa Wight and others it was stated that a meeting had been convened with David Lidington and some representatives of the infected and affected where they presented 2 papers for consideration.

Published on:

Sir Brian Langstaff, Chairman of the Infected Blood Inquiry, sent a letter to David Lidington, Minister for the Cabinet Office, in relation to the commemoration event before the Inquiry's preliminary hearings and raised the issue of access to financial and psychological support.

Published on:

In his written statement William Vineall stated that a change in the EIBSS was implemented in July 2019 which meant that discretionary income top-ups were no longer part of the support scheme for infected persons and non-discretionary annual payments were increased.

Published on:

Within her written statement to the Inquiry Jackie Doyle-Price reflected how she was able to achieve an uplift in payments to achieve parity with Scotland

Published on:

Within a submission Seamus Camplisson to Richard Pengelly and Robin Swann in Northern Ireland described the decision to raise payments as a political decision

Published on:

Within Parliamentary Material it is announced the recently announced £30 million uplift in payments in England will be coming from existing 2019/20 Department of Health and Social Care's non-National Health Service budget and is not a new allocation from HM Treasury.

Published on:

In 1993, a Committee to Study HIV Transmission through Blood and Blood Products was established by the US Institute of Medicine. The study was published in 1995 and concluded that it would have been "reasonable to require" donated blood to be screened for the anti-HBc antibody and for male donors to be asked about sexual activity with other men in January 1983.

Published on:

Dr John Barbara stated in his witness statement that he did not agree entirely with Dr Craske's view regarding anti-HBc screening. Dr Barbara felt that anti-HBc screening would help to detect the transmission of AIDS. He said: "testing for anti-HBc would give some evidence of a past hepatitis B infection. Anti-HBc positivity might reflect a shared route of infection by HBV or HIV."

Published on:

The minutes of the meeting of regional transfusion directors on 18 May 1983 did not record the consideration of whether anti-HBc screening could help to detect the transmission of AIDS.

Published on:

The minutes of the CBLA Central Committee's first meeting on 21 June 1983 recorded a discussion of ways of dealing with the problems of AIDS for the blood supply, and that not enough was known about AIDS to enable any decision to be made. It is unclear whether any of the discussion focused on surrogate testing.

Published on:

At a meeting of the CBLA Central Committee on 27 November 1983, the proportion of donations which might be excluded by a positive test was indicated by the percentage of samples obtained in Bristol which tested positive, which was 0.75% (75
cases out of 10,000 tests). However, it emerged that 48 out of these 75 were prisoners, so it was decided that another 10,000 donations excluding those from prisoners would be tested.

Published on:

The minutes of the meeting of the CBLA Central Committee on 7 November 1983 recorded that the Committee "welcomed the action taken with respect to the investigation of the use of surrogate tests".

Published on:

Dr Brian McClelland prepared a discussion paper on "Non-specific markers for persons at risk of transmitting AIDS" in response to studies of anti-HBc in the donor population of some RTCs and discussion as to the further action that should be taken in relation to anti-HBc positive donors.

Published on:

A letter from Dr Brian McClelland to Dr Cash regarding a study on non-specific markers for high-risk donors noted that the CBLA wanted a proposal at the end of February 1984 and that Dr Tim Wallington was deputed to do this.

Published on:

An outline proposal for a donor screening study to be initially conducted in Edgware and Bristol was prepared by Dr Tim Wallington and presented at a CBLA meeting. It evidenced an early hypothesis that AIDS could be transmitted through blood and proposed 50,000 donors across the two centres would be screened to see the correlation between "at risk" of AIDS groups and anti-HBc positive results.

Published on:

The final version of a proposal titled "The Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS): Can laboratory screening tests identify blood donors at high risk of transmitting AIDS?" was presented by Dr Tim Wallington to the CBLA meeting on 28 February 1984. It was written in the form of a grant proposal to the MRC.

Published on:

Dr Smithies of the DHSS wrote to Dr Sibellas following the CBLA meeting on 28 February 1984 and explained that: "when asked I said that the Department [of Health] would be very happy to look at the proposal but similar constraints to those at the MRC (i.e funds) would apply."

Published on:

A note of a CBLA Central Committee for Research and Development meeting on 28 February 1984 taken by Dr Albert Bell, of the Scottish Home and Health Department, recorded his sense that there was not a great enthusiasm for this particular study, but that steps had to be taken to identify potential transmitters of AIDS and no one could produce a better study protocol.

Published on:

Dr T Wallington wrote to Dr Gunson explaining that the study to be proposed on 28 February 1984 was smaller than originally discussed, but that he hoped they would be able to pursue them and that he was sure it would provide answers if they did.

Published on: