Subscribe to Search results

William Connon wrote to Sir Nigel Crisp confirming the UK government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

Published on:

DHSC and Lord Warner consistently said the Government's line was that a public inquiry was not justified in response to Lord Morris' Parliamentary question.

Published on:

The government line remained that no wrongful practices had been employed and there was no justification for a public inquiry.

Published on:

In Scotland, the line to take was to refer to the Executive's internal report and confirm that a public inquiry was not believed to be in the interest of those involved.

Published on:

In Scotland, the line to take asserted that there was no reason to believe anyone had acted wrongly and that a public inquiry would be a difficult, lengthy and expensive process.

Published on:

Bob Stock told the Department of Health in England that he anticipated demands for a public inquiry would be renewed with support from the Scottish Parliament.

Published on:

Malcolm Chisholm was asked by the Health and Community Care Committee when he would be able to comment on whether further evidence provided by campaigners was sufficient to hold a public inquiry.

Published on:

Malcolm Chisholm wrote to Christine Grahame MSP rejecting the contention that there was new evidence that necessitated a public inquiry.

Published on:

Sandra Falconer (MRS) responded to a letter which sought support for a public inquiry into the infection of haemophiliacs with HIV and Hepatitis C.

Published on:

Ian Gordon, director of Service Policy and Planning, Scottish Executive, advised not to claim more than was known to be understood at the time.

Published on:

The Scottish Office produced lines to take in a meeting with Philip Dolan.

Published on:

Bob Stock wrote that they did not believe that there were any lessons to be learnt that had not already been learnt.

Published on:

Robert Stock produced a written statement in response to a Rule 9 request by the Inquiry

Published on:

As per a request from the Minister for Health and Community Care, a SWOT analysis was produced in relation to a possible public inquiry.

Published on:

Andy Kerr wrote that a public inquiry had been considered by Ministers and it was felt that nothing could be learned that had already been learned.

Published on:

Andy Kerr (MSP) wrote to Euan Robson (MSP) expressing the view was that there was nothing more to be learned from a public inquiry.

Published on:

Scottish Haemophilia Forum meeting at which Andy Kerr advised that he remained unconvinced of the added value a public inquiry would bring.

Published on:

A literature review was requested to establish what materials in relation to Hepatitis C could be released into the public domain.

Published on:

Minutes of the meeting held on the HGH/CDJ Litigation were sent by Neil Townley.

Published on:

A note was written on the topic of Haemophilia and Hepatitis C, the case for financial recompense ahead of the special briefing for the meeting that had been held in September 1997 with the Secretary of State, Frank Dobson.

Published on: