Subscribe to Search results

In a memo it was confirmed that the Government resisted calls for payments to those who had contracted Hepatitis C through NHS treatment.

Published on:

In a memo from Rosamund Roughton to Roger Scofield it was stated: "It was agreed that we needed to pursue immediately a positive strategy in respect of haemophiliacs and others who might have been infected with Hepatitis C."

Published on:

A memo was sent from John Saw to Roger Scofield with suggested amendments to a submission on Hepatitis C.

Published on:

In a memo from Roger Scofield to Andy Hollebon relating to the Government's response to Hepatitis C it was recorded that "everything has been done that could have been done...on the advice of the Advisory Committee on the Virological Safety of Blood".

Published on:

In an undated letter from Tom Sackville to Ann Winterton it was recorded that "The Government do not accept that there has been any negligence and have no plans to make payments to such patients."

Published on:

The Government position in relation to the cost of payments for HCV infected individuals was that "If payments were made to haemophilia patients infected with Hepatitis C, there would be a similar number of HCV infected blood transfusion recipients who would press for payment."

Published on:

In a memo from Roger Scofield to Dr Rejman on the Hepatitis C Payment Scheme it was noted that "Ministers have clearly got the wind up and don't feel that we have a good defence."

Published on:

In a memo from Roger Scofield to Charles Blake and others on the Hepatitis C Payment Scheme it was noted that "the Government might have to reconsider its position if determined cross party support were to emerge, especially if this was fuelled by a major press campaign."

Published on:

In a memo from Roger Scofield to Rosamund Roughton on the Hepatitis C Payment Scheme it was noted that ministers had "publicly stated that they are against making any payments to those infected but are concerned that the arguments we have given them for defending such a policy are unconvincing."

Published on:

An official within the Department of Health's finance division minuted the Permanent Secretary's Private Office regarding the Hepatitis C Payment Scheme, stating that past experience was that obtaining Treasury agreement was not an easy matter and was somewhat time-consuming.

Published on:

The Permanent Secretary held a meeting with officials to discuss whether it would be appropriate to prepare options for some kind of payment scheme for those infected with Hepatitis C as a result of NHS treatment.

Published on:

Roger Scofield wrote to colleagues outlining that the Minister of Health has come out in favour of making payments to people with haemophilia and others infected by HCV.

Published on:

The Top of the Office meeting was held once a week and attended by the five ministers, Permanent Secretary, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Nursing Officer, NHS Chief Executive and Chief Inspector of Social Services.

Published on:

Viriginia Bottomley described how, in light of the report on Gerald Malone's meeting with John Marshall MP, alarm bells started to ring.

Published on:

In a paper, Roger Scofield cautioned (regarding the Hepatitis C Payment) that such a scheme was the exact opposite of the position that the Government generally and health ministers in particular had taken to date.

Published on:

Graham Hart was highly doubtful about a scheme, suggesting that there would be great resistance to any weakening of the line and that any concession towards Hepatitis C victims would be very difficult.

Published on:

Tom Sackville thought the Permanent Secretary's position looked "pretty decisive" and that it would be "'important that the Secretary of State is well briefed for a Cabinet discussion'."

Published on:

In a memo to Andy Taylor, Graham Hart wrote "I do not need to repeat the difficulties that would arise over any decision to concede on payments to those infected with Hepatitis C by blood transfusions or blood products. Those are difficulties of principle as well as practice".

Published on:

Baroness Cumberlege contended that it would be "a great mistake to concede payments for Hepatitis C victims. It was a mistake to concede the HIV victims but the scheme was at least clearly defined".

Published on:

Gerald Malone changed his mind in asserting that he would "firmly and enthusiastically support a strategy to resist compensation payments" and that a "logical and defensible distinction can be drawn between HIV sufferers and Hepatitis C sufferers."

Published on: