Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
The Inquiry Report
Additional Compensation Report
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
Compensation Framework Study
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
NHS Psychological Support
Confidential Psychological Support
Support Groups
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Treatment and aftercare
Medical Evidence
Expenses Guidance
Contact us
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
A woman's application to EIBSS was refused because she did not have sufficient medical records.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Ronald Edge gave evidence to the Inquiry expressing that the application process for the special category mechanism has been complicated and unclear.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
A witness described applying to EIBSS for payment under the Special Category Mechanism as rather off-putting as it appeared to require a very high level of illness to qualify for payment.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
A witness stated that the Haemophilia Centre arranged to have an appointment with the specialist nurse, and a social worker to assist them with completing the EIBSS for payment under the Special Category Mechanism application form.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
A witness described that she had to reapply to the EIBSS and provide evidence that she and her husband were together at the time of his death from liver failure. She found this system difficult and onerous.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Su Gorman told the Inquiry that she found the wording of the EIBSS forms she had to complete insensitive.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
A witness infected with Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C described the means tested nature of the EIBSS financial assistance as 'disgusting'.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Simon Gittins described the day-to-day operations of EIBSS as 'unreliable' upon receiving incorrect payments with no guarantee of future payments.
Published on:
17 October, 2024
The Belfast Regional Transfusion Centre began storing donor serum samples. Dr Morris McClelland explained to the Inquiry that this was influenced by Edinburgh.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Morris McClelland did not consider producing an AIDS leaflet for Belfast. He was aware a national leaflet was being produced and thought it was appropriate to follow the national approach.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
According to Dr Morris McClelland's recollection, an amended questionnaire with a question along the lines of "Have you read the AIDS leaflet" was introduced.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
A questionnaire asking donors if they had read the AIDS leaflet was expected to be introduced but was not made available by the Department of Health.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
The armed forces were a source of blood donors. Dr Colin Entwistle described these military sessions as "incredibly beneficial" and did not perceive military donors to impose particular extra risks.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Generally, between 100 and 200 donors would be bled at each session. According to Dr Entwistle, at Oxford about 50% of around 200 donors called would attend plus around 10% walk-ins and at a Cambridge military session there may be as many as 240 donors.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Each blood donor would be booked in by a member of the clerical staff who should have had a copy of (and/or received training on) the most up-to-date national guidelines produced by the regional transfusion directors, and donors would be given written material on arrival, which set out the eligibility criteria.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
In his oral evidence, Dr Colin Entwistle accepted that discussions about whether or not the donor might have an infectious disease would in effect be taking place in public in an "open forum".
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Colin Entwistle was elected to serve on the care and selection of donors working party by the western division of the regional transfusion centres and tasked with producing the guidelines for donor exclusion. According to Dr Entwistle, the guidelines were "a common agreed policy which everyone can agree to" and were not to be seen as a record of best practice.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Colin Entwistle, director of the Oxford Centre, did not consider the education of his colleagues on the use of blood to be part of his role.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
According to Dr Colin Entwistle's oral evidence, the haematologists in the Oxford region used to meet every three months or so, which provided a good opportunity for face-to-face discussions.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Colin Entwistle told the Inquiry that Oxford could have switched from providing plasma to the Blood Product Laboratory to producing cryoprecipitate in a matter of days.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2292
Page
2293
Page
2294
Page
2295
Current page
2296
Page
2297
Page
2298
Page
2299
Page
2300
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last