Subscribe to Search results

The Treasury wrote to John Reid setting out its position in relation to the ex gratia scheme.

Published on:

John Reid wanted a UK Scheme, especially an English Scheme, and wanted to work with the other devolved nations on this.

Published on:

Once John Reid reached the decision on ex gratia payments, he was not faced with any resistance from officials.

Published on:

John Reid's considerations in relation to his decision to reversing the Government's policy on Hepatitis C compensation occurred soon after taking up his role as Secretary of State.

Published on:

Sir John Major perceived that nothing wrong was done.

Published on:

The Government was aware that Hepatitis C was associated with drug use.

Published on:

The CMO led work on rising NHS litigation costs and the clinical negligence system and rejected the case for a 'no-fault' compensation scheme.

Published on:

In light of the upcoming publication of Lord Ross's preliminary report calling for support for patients infected with Hepatitis C, Scottish ministers felt that they "had to offer something".

Published on:

John Canavan was the head of the section responsible for policy on blood supply and blood safety within the Department of Health and he worked closely with Dr Rejman who was a senior medical officer.

Published on:

In the House of Lords, Lord Morris of Manchester cited what Lord Winston had called "the worst treatment disaster in the history of the National Health Service".

Published on:

Alison Smithies wrote to Michael O'Connor regarding newspaper articles alleging the intention of the Haemophilia Society to seek damages for individuals infected by blood products saying that the comments were seen as "sabre rattling by the Secretary in an effort to draw comments."

Published on:

A Department of Health memo noted that establishing an inquiry or considering ex-gratia payments could set a precedent and ministers were advised to continue to "strongly defend the Court action"

Published on:

Dr Rejman wrote about Dr Hilary Pickles that he had suggested "one possible way out of the difficulty would be the setting up of a Royal Commission to investigate the problem of HIV and haemophilia".

Published on:

Baroness Virginia Bottomley suggested that in 1990 the option of having a public inquiry was not attractive for two reasons: it would not report back in time to satisfy the immediate calls for financial help and it would go beyond its scope to deal with wider issues of compensation.

Published on:

A Department submission invited Ministers to judge whether the political costs of maintaining the present line outweighed the risks of setting an expensive precedent by settling out of court.

Published on:

The Department of Health was aware that most people with bleeding disorders who had received unheated concentrates had been infected with non-A non-B Hepatitis.

Published on:

The Haemophilia Society and Alf Morris MP sought "a special inquiry into the compensation issue of those with haemophilia infected with the HIV virus."

Published on:

Stephen Dorrell, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health, responded to an MP raising the question of an inquiry by differentiating the situation of those with haemophilia from those injured from thalidomide because the issue in the latter was one of corporate liability.

Published on:

For much of the 1990s, campaigning activities focused principally on the absence of financial assistance for people with haemophilia who had been infected with Hepatitis C.

Published on:

The Government's failure to heed repeated requests for financial assistance for people with haemophilia who had been infected with Hepatitis C led to a day of action with representatives delivering a petition and white lilies to Downing Street.

Published on: