Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation Hide — Main navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • The Chair
    • Inquiry Team
    • Expert Groups
    • Inquiry Intermediaries
    • Core Participants
    • Legal Representatives
    • Inquiry Memorial
    • Financial Reports
  • Approach
    • Terms of reference
    • List of Issues
    • Statements of approach
    • Inquiry Principles
  • News
    • News
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Reports
    • The Inquiry Report
    • Additional Compensation Report
    • First Interim Report
    • Second Interim Report
    • Compensation Framework Study
  • Evidence
    • Evidence
    • Hearings Archive
  • Compensation
  • Support
    • Support and FAQs
    • NHS Psychological Support
    • Support Groups
    • Infected Blood Support Schemes
    • Hepatitis C Testing
  • Contact us
Accessibility Tool
  • Zoom in
  • Zoom out
  • Reset
  • Contrast
  • Accessibility tool
Get in touch

Quick Exit

Subscribe to Search results

The House of Lords heard how documents that had been disclosed by the Department of Health held by the claimants' solicitors, Blackett Hart & Pratt Solicitors, in the HIV litigation were returned. However, some 600 files were destroyed.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Anita James showed her notebook which demonstrated the numbers of the missing files.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Around early 2006 documents held by the claimants' solicitors in the HIV litigation were returned. However, these were copies of the documents rather than the Department of Health's original versions.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

The Scottish Executive released a large number of documents, some of which the Department of Health, in an internal memo, believed would "inevitably be copies of the ones destroyed by DH".

Published on: 20 September, 2024

William Connon instructed that a "definitive list" be compiled showing all sets of documents that were destroyed, when they were destroyed, the circumstances of destruction and "likelihood of the documents which had just been found by the solicitors being copies of some of the destroyed documents." Ministers also instructed that an independent legal expert review the documents returned from the claimants' solicitors in the HIV litigation.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

The Department of Health commissioned an independent legal expert to undertake an initial analysis of the documents that had been returned from the claimants' solicitors in the HIV litigation.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

The parents of a child with haemophilia complained about the lack of recombinant Factor 8, even though the use of the product had been deemed "appropriate on clinical grounds" by the treating clinician.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

HM Customs and Excise decided that recombinant Factor 8 could no longer be considered exempt from VAT because it was not a biological product.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

The tax tribunal gave a detailed judgment when upholding HMCE in deciding that the sale of recombinant was liable to VAT. It recorded findings of fact that recombinant was "now considered as the treatment of choice by most clinicians and by the Haemophilia Society."

Published on: 20 September, 2024

The tax tribunal noted that recombinant had the advantages over blood-derived factor concentrate of being available in an unlimited supply, being a renewable source, and having freedom from blood-borne viral contamination. By comparison, purified plasma derived Factor 8 "might contain low levels of viral contamination."

Published on: 20 September, 2024

A Haemophilia Society Board of Trustees' meeting recorded the unequal availability of recombinant Factor 8 across the UK.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

The chair of the Haemophilia Society wrote to Stephen Dorrell reiterating the uneven availability of recombinant Factor 8 across the UK.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

A panel established by the Board of the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust recommended to the Board that "it support the universal availability of recombinant Factor VIII. This recommendation should be conveyed to Health Authorities for funding".

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Graham Barker, director of services and development at the Haemophilia Society, wrote a letter to Alf Morris MP indicating that some health authorities were refusing to pay the additional costs associated with recombinant Factor 8.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Graham Barker wrote to Liz Lynne MP drawing attention to the Government's reluctance to adopt the UKHCDO guidelines and highlighting the difference in approach in Scotland where all children with Haemophilia A had been transferred to recombinant plans, by 1997.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Jan Wallace described her involvement in Haemophilia Wales' campaign in 1997 which aimed to "ensure all haemophiliacs in Wales received the safest treatment known as Recombinant".

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Dr Ludlum raised concerns about the inequality of haemophilia care across the UK, in particular that of the very uneven availability of recombinant factor VIII.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Beverley Tumelty set out the role her late brother, Gareth Lewis, played in campaigning for recombinant treatment for haemophiliacs in Wales. He was Chairman of the South Wales Haemophilia Group during this period.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

An Information Pack produced by the South Wales Haemophilia Group referred to their success in campaigning for Recombinant treatment for all haemophiliacs in Wales.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Dr Graham Winyard and Dr Metters sent a memo to Baroness Jay regarding New Variant CJD and Blood.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Previous
  • …
  • Page 2288
  • Page 2289
  • Page 2290
  • Page 2291
  • Current page 2292
  • Page 2293
  • Page 2294
  • Page 2295
  • Page 2296
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Inquiry

  • Home
  • About
  • Approach
  • News
  • Evidence
  • Support
  • Get in touch

Legal

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility tool

Address

Infected Blood Inquiry
5th Floor
Aldwych House
71-91 Aldwych
London
WC2B 4HN
 
Images of individuals on the website are used with the agreement of those featured or are stock images.

Follow us

© Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.