Subscribe to Search results

That the government did not accept wrongful practices had been employed and that a public inquiry was not justified was recorded as the Blood Policy Team's line to take.

Published on:

Melanie Johnson, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health, wrote that the government did not employ any wrongful practices and that a public inquiry was not justified.

Published on:

Following a request from Scottish officials, William Connon confirmed the government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

Published on:

John Reid wrote to Andy Kerr confirming that the UK government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

Published on:

William Connon wrote to Sir Nigel Crisp confirming the UK government's decision was not to hold a public inquiry on the grounds that it was not justified.

Published on:

DHSC and Lord Warner consistently said the Government's line was that a public inquiry was not justified in response to Lord Morris' Parliamentary question.

Published on:

The government line remained that no wrongful practices had been employed and there was no justification for a public inquiry.

Published on:

In Scotland, the line to take was to refer to the Executive's internal report and confirm that a public inquiry was not believed to be in the interest of those involved.

Published on:

In Scotland, the line to take asserted that there was no reason to believe anyone had acted wrongly and that a public inquiry would be a difficult, lengthy and expensive process.

Published on:

Bob Stock told the Department of Health in England that he anticipated demands for a public inquiry would be renewed with support from the Scottish Parliament.

Published on:

Malcolm Chisholm was asked by the Health and Community Care Committee when he would be able to comment on whether further evidence provided by campaigners was sufficient to hold a public inquiry.

Published on:

Malcolm Chisholm wrote to Christine Grahame MSP rejecting the contention that there was new evidence that necessitated a public inquiry.

Published on:

Sandra Falconer (MRS) responded to a letter which sought support for a public inquiry into the infection of haemophiliacs with HIV and Hepatitis C.

Published on:

Ian Gordon, director of Service Policy and Planning, Scottish Executive, advised not to claim more than was known to be understood at the time.

Published on:

The Scottish Office produced lines to take in a meeting with Philip Dolan.

Published on:

Bob Stock wrote that they did not believe that there were any lessons to be learnt that had not already been learnt.

Published on:

Robert Stock produced a written statement in response to a Rule 9 request by the Inquiry

Published on:

As per a request from the Minister for Health and Community Care, a SWOT analysis was produced in relation to a possible public inquiry.

Published on:

Andy Kerr wrote that a public inquiry had been considered by Ministers and it was felt that nothing could be learned that had already been learned.

Published on:

Andy Kerr (MSP) wrote to Euan Robson (MSP) expressing the view was that there was nothing more to be learned from a public inquiry.

Published on: