Subscribe to Search results

Dr Troop announced the investigation into the loss of documents relating to the Hepatitis C litigation to his colleagues.

Published on:

Dr Troop suggested that some of the medical professionals involved were "not traditional civil servants and this may have an impact on file keeping standards."

Published on:

Yvonne de Sampayo said that she had been asked for the minutes of the ACVSB meeting as a longshot and had found some records and forwarded them on.

Published on:

A Hepatitis C litigation interview which noted that Anita James found it bizarre that Yvonne de Sampayo destroyed Dr Metters' personal papers.

Published on:

William Burleigh noted that because Dr Metters' papers were his own extra copies he was excluded from investigation into the failing of registered file procedure.

Published on:

It was stated regarding a Freedom of Information request that the Departmental Records Office had certificates of destruction but that they doubted they would be useful because they only gave the weight of the papers collected and destroyed.

Published on:

A Freedom of Information request posed a question why an inexperienced staff member had been permitted to make decisions to destroy sensitive and important files.

Published on:

Letter from Patricia Hewitt to Charles Clarke stated that papers relating to the treatment of haemophilia patients and blood safety should not have been destroyed, but could not provide an explanation as to why they had been.

Published on:

In an internal memo it was stated that only half of the HIV discovery documents had been sourced.

Published on:

Ruth McEwen confirmed to Dr Rejman that the SOL had a complete set of HIV discovery files.

Published on:

Dr Rejman provided a list of the documents to Ruth McEwen that had been disclosed in the HIV litigation.

Published on:

The joint written statement of William Vineall and Lorraine Jackson noted that there was a file gap of 44 documents in relation to HIV discovery.

Published on:

Ruth McEwen stated in a letter to Dr Rejman and Mr Pudlo that she "would like to put Mr Pudlo and CA OPU colleagues on notice that if the claims [Hepatitis C] are to proceed discovery will have to be done."

Published on:

Ruth McEwen wrote to Dr Rejman asking for clarification regarding who would be conducting the discovery of the CA OPU2 files.

Published on:

Dr Rejman wrote to Ruth McEwen stating that it was "wholly inappropriate and wasteful of resources for any further discovery to be undertaken until we were certain that something would come of the HCV haemophilia case."

Published on:

In a letter from Ruth McEwen to Dr Rejman and Mr Guiness it was stated that "Dr Rejman agreed that he would prune the HIV discovery documents removing obviously irrelevant documents" and that Ruth McEwen planned to create a second discovery list of "missing documents which cannot be located at CAOU or SOLB4".

Published on:

Tables show that a number of files related to the Hepatitis C discovery could not be found.

Published on:

Charles Lister was the head of the blood policy unit at the Department of Health from 1998 - 2003.

Published on:

In his oral evidence to the Inquiry regarding the decision making in the Department of Health, Charles Lister explained that he was not sure whether he could have done anything differently and that GEB documents should not have "been marked for destruction at all".

Published on:

In his written statement to the Inquiry Lord Crisp stated that that he could not recall having a meeting with Lord Jenkin on 13 April 2005 and that there was no suggestion that the destruction of records "was the result of a deliberate decision in the sense of anyone knowingly acting outside Departmental policy."

Published on: