Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation Hide — Main navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • The Chair
    • Inquiry Team
    • Expert Groups
    • Inquiry Intermediaries
    • Core Participants
    • Legal Representatives
    • Inquiry Memorial
    • Financial Reports
  • Approach
    • Terms of reference
    • List of Issues
    • Statements of approach
    • Inquiry Principles
  • News
    • News
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Reports
    • The Inquiry Report
    • Additional Compensation Report
    • First Interim Report
    • Second Interim Report
    • Compensation Framework Study
  • Evidence
    • Evidence
    • Hearings Archive
  • Compensation
  • Support
    • Support and FAQs
    • NHS Psychological Support
    • Support Groups
    • Infected Blood Support Schemes
    • Hepatitis C Testing
  • Contact us
Accessibility Tool
  • Zoom in
  • Zoom out
  • Reset
  • Contrast
  • Accessibility tool
Get in touch

Quick Exit

Subscribe to Search results

In her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Susan Hallwood said that it was not haemophilia that killed her sons - it was AIDS and AIDS should have been on the death certificates.

Published on: 12 August, 2024

The Inquiry has heard evidence of a large level of under-reporting, so that data important for public safety is never recorded in any document or on any system even before questions of its retention or destruction arise.

Published on: 25 July, 2024

Dr Alison Cave told the Inquiry she thought we were "some way off" having a UK-wide linkage of GP and hospital care.

Published on: 25 July, 2024

Despite the fact that transfused blood in all parts of the UK is considered to be safe, witnesses had concerns about whether compliance with best practice standards could be better, and believe that it should be

Published on: 14 August, 2024

In his oral evidence to the Inquiry Professor Mark Bellamy stated that with regard to transfusion of red cells in his own area of clinical practice, it was "better not to transfuse to 'normal' blood count values but to adopt a lower target, a restrictive transfusion threshold".

Published on: 14 August, 2024

In his oral evidence to the Inquiry Professor Mark Bellamy stated that although there was a small working group of clinicians and SHOT staff, SHOT's steering group was drawn from a wide range of individuals from the Royal Colleges and professional bodies and it was independent of government.

Published on: 14 August, 2024

The annual reports of SHOT contained recommendations for transfusion safety.

Published on: 14 August, 2024

Professor Bellamy, the present SHOT Steering Group chair, described the extent to which recommended measures are implemented as well as the response rates to the surveys as "variable".

Published on: 14 August, 2024

In his oral evidence, Professor Neuberger stated that SHOT's recommendations were accepted and implemented for additional testing for Hepatitis B infections.

Published on: 14 August, 2024

Professor Bellamy in his oral evidence stated that he thought that mandating Trusts to have a designated person in place to report haemovigilance matters might be possible but that If such a post were not mandated, he feared that what would then be an optional position could be an early victim of cuts.

Published on: 14 August, 2024

Professor James Neuberger was "very much in favour" of legally mandating reporting, and said that having someone statutorily responsible would be a "very useful start."

Published on: 14 August, 2024

Dr Cave was concerned to encourage a system-wide culture for reporting events, and feared that having a single person appointed as responsible might take away from a sense of collective responsibility. Making reporting as easy as possible seemed to her to be a critical factor in making an impact

Published on: 14 August, 2024

In her oral evidence to the Inquiry, Dr Sarah Meekin reported: "we often hear people talking about people feeling like lower-class citizens in terms of how they feel that they were treated, and any lack of parity contributes to those feelings and to that experience, and so that has a sort of ongoing psychological impact as well".

Published on: 30 July, 2024

In his oral evidence, Professor Melville stated that medical staff are required by the GMC to undergo annual appraisal which is linked to revalidation.

Published on: 14 August, 2024

Professor John Dillon, clinical lead for Hepatitis C in NHS Tayside, described the approach to treatment of Hepatitis C in Scotland.

Published on: 20 September, 2024

Inquiry Chair’s final letter

Published on: 31 March, 2026

Contact us

Published on: 31 March, 2026

On the third day of the Inquiry's preliminary hearing, Mr Bradley, solicitor for the Haemophilia Society, made his opening statements in relation to the pharmaceutical companies, stating the product caused infections in the UK.

Published on: 09 September, 2024

On the third day of the Inquiry's preliminary hearing, Steven Snowden QC made submissions on behalf of those represented by Collins Solicitors.

Published on: 09 September, 2024

A witness described the positives of the use of concentrates for home treatment including quicker treatment.

Published on: 08 August, 2024

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Previous
  • …
  • Page 2351
  • Page 2352
  • Page 2353
  • Page 2354
  • Current page 2355
  • Page 2356
  • Page 2357
  • Page 2358
  • Page 2359
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Inquiry

  • Home
  • About
  • Approach
  • News
  • Evidence
  • Support
  • Get in touch

Legal

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility tool

Address

Infected Blood Inquiry
5th Floor
Aldwych House
71-91 Aldwych
London
WC2B 4HN
 
Images of individuals on the website are used with the agreement of those featured or are stock images.

Follow us

© Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.