Subscribe to Search results

A letter from Jack Wood at Cutter stated that Cutter felt it was prudent to no longer effect sales of non-heat-treated product for use in the UK following dramatic changes in the UK regarding heat-treated Factor 8 products.

Published on:

A memo from Jack Wood stated that for inventory which could not be reallocated by Cutter US they were to seek a one year extension from NIBS to allow them to relabel and sell over the coming year into markets not yet converted to heat-treated Factor 8 products.

Published on:

In a memo on figures of Cutte's products it showed that a small short-dated batch mentioned last month had now been sold and several other contacts had shown an interest in other batches and the material had been offered for sale.

Published on:

An internal memo described the outcome of a meeting where Dr Savidge presented results of his profilate HT trials and that the results provided evidence to support Alpha's claim that Profilate HT was free from non-A non-B Hepatitis.

Published on:

Parliamentary questions discussed the issue of unscreened BPL plasma and said issuable blood products which might be contaminated with AIDS had been destroyed.

Published on:

Dr Robert Gerety and Dr David Aronson in an invited review said studies had been completed and others were underway to evaluate methods of stabilising clotting factors as heat was capable of inactivating both Hepatitis B and non-A non-B Hepatitis infectivity.

Published on:

Dr Lane reported that "a research project into the development of coagulation factor concentrates with reduced risk of hepatitis transmission, was an appropriate case for central funding."

Published on:

Dr Lane in his draft proof of evidence for the HIV Haemophilia Litigation, wrote "The documentation I have discussed above indicates our intention to define a heat treatment process capable of full virus inactivation, probably requiring more severe heating than was currently recognised."

Published on:

There were discussions at BPL about the degree of success commercial firms had in reducing hepatitis transmission, and answers being sought to questions about the safety and efficacy of those heat-treated concentrates which were being developed elsewhere.

Published on:

The "Proposal to Develop a 'Hepatitis-Safe' Factor VIII Concentrate" noted that "NANBH causes increasing concern, less on account of its acute effects (although deaths have been reported) than because of its association with chronic active hepatitis in later life", and that AIDS was "not yet proven to be of viral origin, but this is strongly presumed."

Published on:

Dr Lane's view was that "the risks of transmission of HIV were such that heat treatment should be employed even if it turned out to be a temporary expedient."

Published on:

There were fears that the Factor 9 concentrate in particular - but also Factor 8 - might give rise to a greater risk of thrombosis from the heat-treated product, although research facilities were limited, scientific staff were few, and BPL suffered from a lack of viral containment equipment.

Published on:

Dr Richard Lane recorded that no work was done by BPL during 1981 to research heat treatment.

Published on:

BPL planned to apply dry heat treatment to all the Factor 8 produced at BPL because it was shown that heat treatment appeared to inactivate the HTLV-3 virus which by then had been identified as the cause of AIDS.

Published on:

According to Dr Lane, a "requirement for central funding for research and development was a continuous theme in 1981."

Published on:

Dr Lane complained that the "Department of Health policy was that Regional Health Authorities were to all intents and purposes responsible for allocation of budgets, and the Department of Health would not intervene in the exercise of their discretion."

Published on:

Dr Lane's account of 1981 was one of his battles to secure a commitment from the government to redevelop BPL, and to fund the improvements necessary following an adverse Medicines' Inspectorate report.

Published on:

Dr James Smith proposed to Dr Lane some first outline proposals for programmes to research tackling the transmission of viruses by coagulation factor concentrates. This proposal, according to Dr Lane, marked "the start of a move towards a viral inactivation programme."

Published on:

It was apparent that there was some resistance by some clinicians to the use of heat-treated product.

Published on:

Professor Garrott Allen wrote to Dr William Maycock stating: "As you know" Cutter's Konyne was "extraordinarily hazardous".

Published on: