Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Inquiry Memorial
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
The Inquiry Report
Additional Compensation Report
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
Compensation Framework Study
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Support and FAQs
NHS Psychological Support
Support Groups
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Hepatitis C Testing
Contact us
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
Kate Lee, a solicitor acting for the central defendants, reported that counsel had considered the possibility of sending a letter informing the plaintiffs that if they discontinued against the defendants the Government would forgo its own costs. It was suggested that, viewed with the additional money being made available to the Macfarlane Trust, this "may be seen as a sympathetic gesture."
Published on:
21 August, 2024
A memo from Richard Gutowski to Kate Lee, regarding HIV litigation, expressed unease about writing to plaintiffs informing them that the Government would forgo its own costs if they discontinued against the defendants. It was felt this could be construed as overly aggressive.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
A memo from Charles Dobson to Clive Wilson expressed his view that an open letter warning the plaintiffs about costs of proceedings could be too easily misinterpreted.
Published on:
17 October, 2024
A memo from Donald Acheson to Virginia Bottomley and Kenneth Clarke urged the Government to make an ex-gratia settlement to people with haemophilia infected in relation to the HIV litigation.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
A memo from Strachan Heppell to the CMO, the Minister of State for Health and the Secretary of State set out the options for responding to the litigation.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
A note to ministers on the haemophilia AIDS Litigation invited Ministers to review the government's position in light of: (i) Mr Justice Ognall's statement to consider an out-of-court settlement; (ii) advice from Counsel; and (iii) the Regional Directors of Public Health submission.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
Kenneth Clarke was in favour of sticking to the Government's legal defence and continuing to fight the litigation. He did not deem it necessary at that stage to send a memo to the Prime Minister.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
Kenneth Clarke sought to discuss the issues of settlement with the Chief Secretary to the Treasury.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
A memo from Stephen Bowden to Andrew Edwards outlined a phone call between the Chief Secretary and the Secretary of State for Health. They had agreed that there were no grounds for offering an out-of-court settlement in relation to people with haemophilia with HIV.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
The plaintiffs' lawyers wrote to the central defendants in response to Mr Justice Ognall's observations and proposed that consideration be given to a settlement.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
A Department of Health summary of the campaign for the settlement was provided in a briefing to the next Secretary of State.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
At a meeting between counsel for the central defendants and lead counsel for the plaintiffs, the Government lawyers indicated that they could not initiate a compromise but were prepared to listen.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
The steering committee of the plaintiffs met and a further meeting between counsel for the parties was arranged.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
The figures in the proposed scheme of compromise were to cover all the people with haemophilia registered with the Macfarlane Trusts as well as all the plaintiffs.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
William Waldegrave and David Mellor wrote to the Prime Minister regarding the proposed settlement. They attached particular importance to a number of points, including "recipients of the new money would have to undertake to drop the existing cases and forswear bringing any future cases on the matter".
Published on:
21 August, 2024
Civil servants told the Prime Minister John Major there were significant risks attached to settlement on the basis proposed, but the Health Secretary, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Social Security Secretary, and counsel all thought that those were outweighed by the advantages.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
The Prime Minister John Major agreed to the settlement proposals.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
William Waldegrave wished to make the announcement regarding settlement, whether or not the steering committee of lawyers representing the plaintiffs had agreed to the proposals. This caused tension with the Treasury.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
The solicitor who was chairman of the Scottish Haemophilia/HIV Litigation Group wrote to the Secretary of State for Scotland, Ian Lang: "Not only were the Scottish lawyers excluded from the discussions with the Government, they were not even advised that these discussions were taking place."
Published on:
21 August, 2024
William Waldegrave provided a written answer to a question regarding the settlement of the litigation.
Published on:
21 August, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2002
Page
2003
Page
2004
Page
2005
Current page
2006
Page
2007
Page
2008
Page
2009
Page
2010
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last