Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Inquiry Memorial
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
The Inquiry Report
Additional Compensation Report
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
Compensation Framework Study
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Support and FAQs
NHS Psychological Support
Support Groups
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Hepatitis C Testing
Contact us
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
Peter Stevens understood that the reason Professor Christine Lee was not passing any applicants from spontaneous clearers was that she believed that any attempt to exclude them was logically or scientifically flawed.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Chris Harrington in a letter to Richard Gutowski asked whether there would be provision made for those who had cleared the virus in the proposed ex gratia payments scheme.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Lord Ross proposed initial lump sum payments and a discretionary trust making ex gratia payments to all those who had probably received blood, blood products or tissue from the NHS in Scotland and who had become infected with Hepatitis C.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Dr Paul Giangrande had been part of a working group which had produced a report about an appropriate payment scheme for the Haemophilia Society in June 2002.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
In "S and Others v the National Blood Authority" a 17-year-old boy cleared HCV and received compensation for an adjustment disorder. This evidence was used in the report for the HCV working party regarding compensation in order to argue in favour of a position for including natural clearers in the compensation scheme.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
The Haemophilia Society responded that a report published into HCV published by the Scottish Executive was a "very thin, incomplete piece of work which does not represent the full inquiry we were seeking".
Published on:
01 August, 2024
"The Guardian" reported that widows and children of people with haemophilia who had died from contaminated blood products could be excluded from a government aid package.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
The application form regarding the Skipton Fund was agreed by all four nations.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
An IBI counsel presentation on the Skipton Fund noted that the majority of Skipton applications were accepted. However, out of those applications that appealed after initial refusal, 49.5% of appeals were accepted.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Records of Hepatitis B patients were frequently missing and there was no check back to see where the donation had come from.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
The Inquiry's interim report highlighted the importance of ensuring Hepatitis B sufferers had been supported in any compensation scheme that might occur.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Compensation could not be given for those infected with Hepatitis C as a result of a donation that was given after 1 September 1991. No case would be reviewed that did not meet this cut off point.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Long-lasting effects of Hepatitis C were not fully considered by the funds and compensation schemes as it was difficult to identify symptoms of the disease before it was formally diagnosed.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Susan Deacon ordered an inquiry into whether people with haemophilia in Scotland had been exposed to unnecessary risk of Hepatitis C through infected blood products in the mid 1980s.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
The Health and Community Care Committee of the Scottish Parliament considered the Haemophilia Society petition calling for a public inquiry, and a second petition from a person who had contracted Hepatitis C as a result of a blood transfusion during a routine operation in 1989.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
The Health and Community Care Committee called Susan Deacon to give evidence on 25 October 2000.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Alan Milburn told the Treasury that the legal advice for the Government was that there was a very limited chance of success following the recommendations in the judgment of the High Court (in England) in "A and Others v the National Blood Authority" and the decision should not be appealed.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
The Skipton Appeals Panel met quarterly. A guidance note was provided to applicants which clarified that they could provide evidence of a transfusion.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
In "A and Others v the National Blood Authority" Mr Justice Burton concluded that routine screening ought to have been introduced by 1 March 1990, and surrogate testing should have been in place by March 1988.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
An amendment to the Skipton Fund occurred in 2016 which made specific clauses applicable to each UK nation.
Published on:
01 August, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2055
Page
2056
Page
2057
Page
2058
Current page
2059
Page
2060
Page
2061
Page
2062
Page
2063
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last