Subscribe to Search results

An article titled Patterns of bleeding in adolescents with severe haemophilia A, written by Dr Aronstam, Dr Rainsford and Dr Painter, was published in the British Medical Journal. All bleeding episodes at Treloars were monitored from 1973-1977 and the results analysed.

Published on:

The housemaster Mr Scott identified a lack of training which would have enabled staff to offer psychological support to infected pupils and he found himself ill-equipped to address individuals' concerns when they were suddenly presented with an HIV diagnosis.

Published on:

Dr Aronstam stated in an article that his experiences led him to advocate for a counselling programme for individuals infected with haemophilia, and believed such a programme would be beneficial if informing individuals about their seropositivity.

Published on:

A business case was prepared with a view to increasing the funding available for the Caxton Foundation for 2014-15.

Published on:

In a letter to Jane Ellison MP, Ann Lloyd provided an update on the progress of addressing the Caxton Foundation's major concerns: to improve governance, to improve communications with beneficiaries, and to better understand what their needs were.

Published on:

Christopher FitzGerald informed the National Support Services Committee that as the Macfarlane Trust's Trust Deed did not allow the Trust to provide services, the Department of Health had decided that the Caxton Foundation should provide services to the Macfarlane Trust, the Eileen Trust, the Skipton Fund and MFET.

Published on:

As of 31 March 2017, the Skipton Fund had made over 5,450 Stage 1 payments and 1,751 Stage 2 payments, whereas the Caxton Foundation had 1,323 beneficiaries, of whom 1,036 were primary beneficiaries infected with Hepatitis C.

Published on:

Martin Harvey, the chief executive of the Caxton Foundation and the Macfarlane Trust, requested early retirement in 2012.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation received £524,000 for disbursement, of which £400,000 had been spent.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation's National Welfare Committee introduced winter fuel payments for beneficiaries with a household income of less than £14,000. These could be processed on a one-off basis by the welfare manager.

Published on:

A Caxton Foundation Q&A document stated that it was possible to visit the Alliance House office without prior arrangement.

Published on:

The Macfarlane Trust's business case noted that administrative and management costs would be greater if economies of scale were not available.

Published on:

Time constraints meant that the Caxton Foundation had to be set up on an 'England only' basis.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation carried out a survey of registrants. Just over half of those who registered and returned the census form had income which fell below what was recognised as the poverty line.

Published on:

The directors of the Caxton Foundation decided to make the winter fuel payment to all primary beneficiaries and widows.

Published on:

Complaints were raised with Anna Soubry MP by a number of beneficiaries of the Caxton Foundation.

Published on:

Peter Stevens and Charles Lister wrote a paper outlining why a beneficiary trustee should not be appointed to the board of directors of the Caxton Foundation.

Published on:

It was recommended that Caxton Foundation clients have the option of receiving vouchers or have the Foundation pay suppliers directly.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation Partnership Group held their first meeting, at which it was noted the office guidelines could not be published on the website.

Published on:

The Board of Directors of Caxton Trustee Limited was told that there were no fixed criteria in relation to household income when considering grant applications, and that each case was considered on its individual merits.

Published on: