Subscribe to Search results

Dr Waiter stated that it was accepted that in order to meet the anticipated demand for principal plasma fractions, a new plant in addition to that already available in the UK must be acquired.

Published on:

A pilot study conducted by Dr Robinson's team using the new Haemonetics v50 machine became a turning point in the UK, showing it enabled plasmapheresis more efficiently and more safely.

Published on:

No existing factory building could be found to accommodate BPL, even with adaptations.

Published on:

A lack of ministerial decision, ministerial uncertainty, and the absence of long-term management arrangements were issues identified by Mr Smart as hampering the work done by the Policy Steering Group for the re-development of BPL.

Published on:

Manual plasmapheresis started to fall out of favour compared to machine plasmapheresis. The Mersey Regional BTS opted against manual plasmapheresis due to problems associated with the need for a continuous supervisor, the time needed to complete a procedure and the need for temperature-controlled centrifuges. This was despite the use of machines.

Published on:

In a written parliamentary answer, Kenneth Clarke, Minister of State for Health, stated that the Government decided in 1982 that self-sufficiency in all blood products should be achieved and the BPL at Elstree should be rebuilt to provide capacity to manufacture blood products needed by the NHS in England and Wales. It was said to be on time for completion in January 1986.

Published on:

Results from a pilot study for large-scale plasma procurement using automated plasmapheresis showed that it could safely and economically produce high-quality plasma, necessary for national self-sufficiency.

Published on:

Investigations in relation to upgrading BPL showed that no British firm had the necessary expertise in the manufacture of blood products and only foreign firms had approached the Department with a view to processing British plasma on the existing basis and to process and re-export plasma from overseas.

Published on:

In December 1979, a submission was made to ministers on the future of BPL and the problems the department faced in terms of the present and future operation of this facility.

Published on:

Ministers were asked to consider and agree whether: that there should be a short-term upgrade to BPL even though it would fall short of recommendations of the Medicines Inspectorate; a decision in principle to rebuild BPL but without commitment to method or timing; and to conduct a further exploration of options for rebuilding within the NHS or in collaboration with industry.

Published on:

Despite the decision to waive Crown immunity, there was some flexibility for NHS facilities. Although manufacturing licenses were not mandated by statute for NHS manufacturing facilities, the policy was that they should still comply with the standards which the Medicines Division would require from commercial firms.

Published on:

With regards to a possible takeover of BPL by Beecham, Peter Wormland of the DHSS stated that was important to reach a decision in principle regarding whether they should reject the commercial option or decide whether they intend to implement it, subject to negations, highlighting issues with further delays to a decision.

Published on:

A review considered various options which included handing over the fractionation process to a commercial industry and concluded that increasing capacity at UK facilities was more viable.

Published on:

B Gidden of the DHSS stated that the arrival of commercial material in quantity precipitated a demand from the NHS which had become more and more insistent, which could not have been anticipated at the time forecast estimates were drawn up a year earlier.

Published on:

A letter from S Murray of the NBTS to Dr Maycock stated that he was quite sure that some clinicians would not be satisfied with halving the amount of cryoprecipitate they were supplied, even if given additional AHG.

Published on:

Malcolm Harris wrote a letter to Ms Westbrook regarding the benefit of transfer pricing to regions. Under the cross-charging system, BPL paid regional transfusion centres a national price for supplying plasma and the regions paid BPL for the blood products supplied.

Published on:

The Central Blood Laboratories Authority's Activity and Current Issues Update Report May 1988 was published.

Published on:

Ian Marshall wrote to Professor Bloom stating that the three high risk groups were excluded from 27 December 1982 but in the press release it gave the date of 20 December 1982.

Published on:

A press release stated Alpha had contacted its "several hundred plasma suppliers" and they "must 'exclude donors' who may be part of three potentially high-risk groups: persons who have been in Haiti: drug abusers and male homosexuals. There is a 'higher incidence of AIDS' in these groups than in the community at large, the company says."

Published on:

Alpha warned on the package insert for Antihaemophilic Factor (Human) dried Profilate Heat-Treated "The causal factors of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome...have no been fully defined. However, HTLV-III/LAV virus has been implicated as a possible agent of the disease."

Published on: