Subscribe to Search results

A working party of the British Medical Association noted that there was a need for more teaching time on transfusion in the medical undergraduate curriculum and in formal postgraduate courses.

Published on:

Sir Kenneth Calman described that there had been several recent high profile healthcare issues which focused on the safety and availability of blood.

Published on:

Sir Kenneth Calman wrote that "good evidence" had been produced that "significant unnecessary blood transfusion" could be avoided

Published on:

Sir Kenneth Calman thought the Serious Hazards of Transfusion report "raised the profile of blood safety amongst clinicians and the public".

Published on:

The UK Chief Medical Officers together hosted a symposium at St Thomas' Hospital, London addressing how better blood transfusion might be encouraged and supported

Published on:

A Standing Advisory Committee on Transfusion Transmitted Infections covered the topics of virological safety of plasma and the epidemiology of Hepatitis C.

Published on:

The Serious Hazards of Transfusion scheme had been calling for a unified body with overall responsibility for blood safety since their 1998-99 report.

Published on:

The Royal College of Physicians identified that of the 50 hospitals audited in their "National Audit of the Clinical Blood Transfusion Process", 87% of them had Maximum Blood Ordering Schedules and in 71% of these, they were regularly reviewed.

Published on:

Overall, autologous transfusions were not available for patients throughout the UK during the 1970s and 1980s. From the 1990s such transfusions were only available in a minority of centres and even they often did not inform patients about the service.

Published on:

Though in 1994 fewer than 50% of the 380 hospitals in England and Wales had a hospital transfusion committee, by January 1998 the Royal College of Physicians published a "National Audit of the Clinical Blood Transfusion Process", which found that of 47 hospitals across the UK, 79% had an HTC and audits of transfusion practice had been undertaken at 65% of those.

Published on:

Reports from clinicians to the Serious Hazards of Transfusion scheme were initially voluntary.

Published on:

In England, a second circular was produced by the Department of Health which included advice for hospitals on how to implement best transfusion practice.

Published on:

From 2002, hospitals were required to participate in the Serious Hazards of Transfusion scheme by the Department of Health.

Published on:

Transfusion experts, clinicians, NHS managers and health authority chief executives from across the UK attended a symposium hosted by UK chief medical officers at St Thomas' Hospital.

Published on:

Following the conference at St Thomas' Hospital, a circular was published which recommended that from March 1999, all NHS Trusts where blood was transfused (i) should ensure that hospital transfusion committees were in place to oversee all aspects of blood transfusion and (ii) participate in the annual Serious Hazards of Transfusion scheme enquiry.

Published on:

The health service circular produced after the conference at St Thomas' Hospital required all NHS Trusts where blood was transfused to have agreed and disseminated local protocols for blood transfusion, based on guidelines and best national practice and supported by in house training and to have explored the feasibility of autologous blood transfusion and ensured that where appropriate, patients are aware of this option.

Published on:

Hospital transfusion committees had become sufficiently prevalent by 1998 for a Health Services Circular to set out a series of minimum requirements for these committees.

Published on:

Dr Contreras discussed her concern and disapproval of his practice with Professor Yacoub "on numerous occasions" but understood that he continued "bleeding members of staff, visiting doctors and members of the Armed Forces for his numerous 'emergencies'."

Published on:

Dr Contreras wrote that she was "aware of at least 2 cases of transfusion-transmitted AIDS in this country where the recipient received untested, non-NBTS, fresh, warm blood. The transfusion records for such patients are appalling, and it will be impossible to find the 'culprit' donor, since the source and the amount given are both unrecorded."

Published on:

Dr Contreras wrote to the Medical Defence Union seeking advice on her legal position if she complied with Professor Yacoub's requests regarding "fresh, warm blood".

Published on: