Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
Compensation Framework Study
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
The Inquiry Report
Publication Day
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Confidential Psychological Support
Interim Payments
Support Groups
Get in touch
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Treatment and aftercare
Medical Evidence
Expenses Guidance
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
A young woman was infected with HIV as a result of a two-unit blood transfusion following the birth of her first child. Her second child was later infected in utero. Her husband was also infected.
Published on:
07 August, 2024
In her written statement to the Inquiry, Baroness Bottomley noted that the Government's judgement in the early 1990s was that arguments for treating those infected through blood transfusions should be the same as people with haemophilia infected through blood transfusions were outweighed by the need to protect against falling into a no-fault compensation scheme.
Published on:
07 August, 2024
David Mellor suggested that there was never any likelihood that payments would not be extended to transfusion patients, and no merit in the distinction between people with haemophilia and transfusion recipients infected with HIV, but that "there needed to be a bit of grief along the way...people can't have easy wins. If you are the Treasury you have to lose in a tough minded way".
Published on:
08 August, 2024
An article in The Observer titled "Killer disease alert over gay blood donors" described the coming risk of AIDs. The article stated, "The disease, characterised by a collapse in the body's ability to fight infection, is a medical time-bomb for Britain. Although only fifteen cases have been reported since it first crossed the Atlantic in December 1981, many more people could be harbouring it, for the incubation period is up to three years."
Published on:
08 August, 2024
The Alliance of Blood Operators Risk-Based Decision-Making Framework for Blood Safety, which applies eight general principles, is the internationally recognised framework for risk-based decision-making.
Published on:
08 August, 2024
The Chief Medical Officer wrote to to all hospital consultants and GPs in Northern Ireland to say that the HCV lookback exercise would be completed by 1995.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
HCV lookback did not look at all cases. The exercise concentrated only on those donors who happened to come back to give blood. It did not address Hepatitis C infection from donors who did not return.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
Marguerite Weatherseed wrote to Dr Metters to accept improvements were required in communication between the Blood Transfusion Service and hospitals where there were particular problems and offering assistance to overcome the bottlenecks.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
The Department of Health claimed the reason for no national lookback was that there was no treatment available for Hepatitis C, which meant once individuals were found, and it was established they had been infected with Hepatitis C, then there was no form of treatment to offer them.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
George Tucker wrote to the Minister's private secretary and clarified that after Westminster's agreement to undertake a Hepatitis C lookback, the plan was for a harmonised approach.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
A minute from Roger Scofield recorded that Hepatitis C had moved from being "a problem on the horizon to a highly political and volatile policy issue".
Published on:
05 August, 2024
The "Evening Standard" reported that the UK Government was considering introducing a lookback, following the death of 12 people with haemophilia and concern about the risk to 3,000 patients who had received blood transfusions. However, there was no reference to undertaking a Hepatitis C lookback within the briefing note sent to the Prime Minister and Health Ministers.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
Dr Andrzej Rejman reported to Dr Metters that the lookback exercise was not being pursued with enough vigour.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
Westminster's position was that the announcement could not go ahead until there was agreement between all territorial departments.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
The establishment of the Hepatitis C Look Back Working Party gave no reason for Scotland to arrange for HCV lookback alone. Scotland was noted to be ready to proceed but was waiting for the other nations to catch up.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
In a policy paper on the current position on Hepatitis C, it was recorded that "Ministers decided not to speed up detection as the bottleneck would then transfer to hepatology clinics."
Published on:
05 August, 2024
The MSBT identified two major bottlenecks that slowed down the lookback exercise: hospital records and counselling.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
At an MSBT meeting it was noted that the lookback had been slower in achieving its objectives than had been predicted and a number of options were considered.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
The "Evening Standard" reported that the UK Government was considering introducing a lookback, following the death of 12 people with haemophilia and concern about the risk to 3,000 patients who had received blood transfusions.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
An article published in "The Independent" highlighted the growing concern about the hepatitis risk to people with haemophilia.
Published on:
05 August, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2190
Page
2191
Page
2192
Page
2193
Current page
2194
Page
2195
Page
2196
Page
2197
Page
2198
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last