Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation Hide — Main navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • The Chair
    • Inquiry Team
    • Expert Groups
    • Inquiry Intermediaries
    • Core Participants
    • Legal Representatives
    • Financial Reports
  • Approach
    • Terms of reference
    • List of Issues
    • Statements of approach
    • Inquiry Principles
  • News
    • News
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Reports
    • Compensation Framework Study
    • First Interim Report
    • Second Interim Report
    • The Inquiry Report
  • Publication Day
  • Evidence
    • Evidence
    • Hearings Archive
  • Compensation
  • Support
    • Confidential Psychological Support
    • Interim Payments
    • Support Groups
    • Get in touch
    • Infected Blood Support Schemes
    • Treatment and aftercare
    • Medical Evidence
    • Expenses Guidance
Accessibility Tool
  • Zoom in
  • Zoom out
  • Reset
  • Contrast
  • Accessibility tool
Get in touch

Quick Exit

Subscribe to Search results

A young woman was infected with HIV as a result of a two-unit blood transfusion following the birth of her first child. Her second child was later infected in utero. Her husband was also infected.

Published on: 07 August, 2024

In her written statement to the Inquiry, Baroness Bottomley noted that the Government's judgement in the early 1990s was that arguments for treating those infected through blood transfusions should be the same as people with haemophilia infected through blood transfusions were outweighed by the need to protect against falling into a no-fault compensation scheme.

Published on: 07 August, 2024

David Mellor suggested that there was never any likelihood that payments would not be extended to transfusion patients, and no merit in the distinction between people with haemophilia and transfusion recipients infected with HIV, but that "there needed to be a bit of grief along the way...people can't have easy wins. If you are the Treasury you have to lose in a tough minded way".

Published on: 08 August, 2024

An article in The Observer titled "Killer disease alert over gay blood donors" described the coming risk of AIDs. The article stated, "The disease, characterised by a collapse in the body's ability to fight infection, is a medical time-bomb for Britain. Although only fifteen cases have been reported since it first crossed the Atlantic in December 1981, many more people could be harbouring it, for the incubation period is up to three years."

Published on: 08 August, 2024

The Alliance of Blood Operators Risk-Based Decision-Making Framework for Blood Safety, which applies eight general principles, is the internationally recognised framework for risk-based decision-making.

Published on: 08 August, 2024

The Chief Medical Officer wrote to to all hospital consultants and GPs in Northern Ireland to say that the HCV lookback exercise would be completed by 1995.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

HCV lookback did not look at all cases. The exercise concentrated only on those donors who happened to come back to give blood. It did not address Hepatitis C infection from donors who did not return.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

Marguerite Weatherseed wrote to Dr Metters to accept improvements were required in communication between the Blood Transfusion Service and hospitals where there were particular problems and offering assistance to overcome the bottlenecks.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

The Department of Health claimed the reason for no national lookback was that there was no treatment available for Hepatitis C, which meant once individuals were found, and it was established they had been infected with Hepatitis C, then there was no form of treatment to offer them.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

George Tucker wrote to the Minister's private secretary and clarified that after Westminster's agreement to undertake a Hepatitis C lookback, the plan was for a harmonised approach.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

A minute from Roger Scofield recorded that Hepatitis C had moved from being "a problem on the horizon to a highly political and volatile policy issue".

Published on: 05 August, 2024

The "Evening Standard" reported that the UK Government was considering introducing a lookback, following the death of 12 people with haemophilia and concern about the risk to 3,000 patients who had received blood transfusions. However, there was no reference to undertaking a Hepatitis C lookback within the briefing note sent to the Prime Minister and Health Ministers.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

Dr Andrzej Rejman reported to Dr Metters that the lookback exercise was not being pursued with enough vigour.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

Westminster's position was that the announcement could not go ahead until there was agreement between all territorial departments.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

The establishment of the Hepatitis C Look Back Working Party gave no reason for Scotland to arrange for HCV lookback alone. Scotland was noted to be ready to proceed but was waiting for the other nations to catch up.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

In a policy paper on the current position on Hepatitis C, it was recorded that "Ministers decided not to speed up detection as the bottleneck would then transfer to hepatology clinics."

Published on: 05 August, 2024

The MSBT identified two major bottlenecks that slowed down the lookback exercise: hospital records and counselling.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

At an MSBT meeting it was noted that the lookback had been slower in achieving its objectives than had been predicted and a number of options were considered.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

The "Evening Standard" reported that the UK Government was considering introducing a lookback, following the death of 12 people with haemophilia and concern about the risk to 3,000 patients who had received blood transfusions.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

An article published in "The Independent" highlighted the growing concern about the hepatitis risk to people with haemophilia.

Published on: 05 August, 2024

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Previous
  • …
  • Page 2190
  • Page 2191
  • Page 2192
  • Page 2193
  • Current page 2194
  • Page 2195
  • Page 2196
  • Page 2197
  • Page 2198
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Inquiry

  • Home
  • About
  • Approach
  • Participate
  • News
  • Evidence
  • Support
  • Get in touch

Legal

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility tool

Address

Infected Blood Inquiry
5th Floor
Aldwych House
71-91 Aldwych
London
WC2B 4HN
 
Images of individuals on the website are used with the agreement of those featured or are stock images.

Follow us

© Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.