Subscribe to Search results

The Executive Committee of the Haemophilia Society had confirmed that the Cardiff case was indeed one of AIDS, but no questions were asked of Professor Bloom about this.

Published on:

The Haemophilia Society Executive Committee agreed unanimously in relation to AIDS that until the situation became clearer in relation to blood supplies, it would be wise for the Society to "wait and see".

Published on:

At a Haemophilia Society Executive Committee, Ken Milne (on behalf of the Blood Products Sub-Committee) introduced a "short and helpful discussion on attitudes to commercial factor VIII".

Published on:

The Haemophilia Society Executive Committee received a paper on commercial Factor 8 from Ken Milne and approved it after minor textual amendments

Published on:

The aims of the Haemophilia Society's HCV campaign were to press for the best treatment and care for people with haemophilia and related bleeding disorders infected with HCV.

Published on:

An agency was hired, at considerable cost, to steer the Haemophilia Society's HCV media campaign.

Published on:

When David Watters joined the Haemophilia Society in early 1981 there were two part-time secretaries working only in the mornings, who were the only other paid employees.

Published on:

In his oral evidence, David Watters described how at the outset his paid role was regarded with suspicion by a number of trustees.

Published on:

It was suggested in oral evidence that in February 1983 there were around 1,500 members of the Haemophilia Society. Members included "interested" parties, such as family members, nurses and social workers.

Published on:

Haemophilia Society trustees attended large London haemophilia centres but did not appreciate the fact that at a local outpatient level "there was really no informed knowledge of haemophilia by the medics who were looking after patients".

Published on:

The Haemophilia Society received medical journals from The Lancet and The British Medical Journal but these were rarely ever read. If an article was considered relevant it would be brought to the trustees' attention.

Published on:

The Haemophilia Society would have received information from newspaper journalists, pharmaceutical companies, civil servants at the Department of Health and Social Security, the Medical Advisory Panel and the UKHCDO.

Published on:

At the beginning of his time at the Haemophilia Society, David Watters suggested there was a "a lack of outreach and lack of grasp of big issues".

Published on:

David Watters stated in oral evidence that the make-up of the Medical Advisory Panel was not as diverse as it could have been and consisted of individuals "who had been around for a very long time".

Published on:

David Watters stated in oral evidence that the Haemophilia Society prioritised maintaining close relationships with influential clinicians.

Published on:

David Watters saw the appointments to the Medical Advisory Panel in the 1980s as nepotistic.

Published on:

In the 1980s the Haemophilia Society only took advice from senior members of the UKHCDO which kept them from examining policies on treatment and recommendations made by the UKHCDO.

Published on:

In 2017 David Watters was shown a letter produced by the Department of Health around 1980, in which Professor Bloom was told to advise patients to continue to use imported blood products as the benefits outweighed the risks.

Published on:

At a board meeting of the Haemophilia Society David Watters and Clive Knight had "great trouble" convincing the trustees of the Executive Committee that AIDS was going to be a problem.

Published on:

There was no reference made to AIDS at the Executive Committee of the Haemophilia Society on 3 March 1983.

Published on: