Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
Compensation Framework Study
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
The Inquiry Report
Publication Day
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Confidential Psychological Support
Interim Payments
Support Groups
Get in touch
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Treatment and aftercare
Medical Evidence
Expenses Guidance
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
Within a memo from Karen Simpson to Michelle O'Neill explained that the Department of Health had informed the devolved administrations that no additional money would be available for them.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Within a memo from Karen Simpson to Gerard Collins and Michelle O'Neill it was discussed how an urgent decision was to be taken "on whether enhanced payments will apply in the north of Ireland or whether the status quo should continue.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Within her written statement to the Inquiry, Michelle O'Neill described how after almost six months, the Minister decided that the new provisions being introduced in England should be replicated in Northern Ireland.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
It was announced by way of statement to the Assembly that new provisions which were being introduced in England should be replicated in Northern Ireland.
Published on:
17 October, 2024
The Northern Ireland Executive collapsed leaving the Department of Health without a minister for the following three years.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Within a memo it was noted that administrative costs would be higher as there would be no shared services with the other UK health administrations.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Within Vaughan Gething's oral evidence to the Inquiry he called the Enhanced Hepatitis Stage 1+ payment an understanding of the hurt that people had already gone through.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Vaughan Gething, as Cabinet Secretary for Health, Well-being and Sport for Wales, made an announcement aimed at ending uncertainty about the level of support available from the Welsh Government.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Vaughan Gething wrote to the 280 people in Wales who were being supported through the Alliance House Organisations asking for their views on support in the future, and two workshops were held at which people could contribute their views.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The results of the consultation on the terms of the scheme from April 2017 onwards led to Vaughan Gething making a written statement setting out the new arrangements for a Welsh scheme.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Vaughan Gething announced the new support arrangements in Wales for those affected by Hepatitis C and HIV. In common with the AHOs, the new scheme expressly remained one for the making of ex gratia payments and were not intended to be compensatory.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The results of the consultation on the terms of the scheme from April 2017 onwards led to Vaughan Gething making a written statement setting out the new arrangements for a Welsh scheme to be administered by Velindre NHS Trust through the NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The Scottish Government asked Professor David Goldberg to establish and preside over an expert group to assess the health and wellbeing of individuals, chronically infected with the Hepatitis C virus who had not yet progressed to advanced Hepatitis C.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The expert group on Hepatitis C considered whether a "method, permitting the robust and rigorous assessment of the impact of hepatitis C on the individual who has not progressed to advanced liver disease, could be developed and command the confidence of both assessors (clinical staff) and assessees (patients)."
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The expert group on Hepatitis C examined the English model where, to qualify, an individual had to answer two questions regarding their Hepatitis C infection.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
There was a general agreement in Scotland that the English model should not be followed.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The Scottish group on Hepatitis C noted that any assessment which was just clinically-based would ignore the very considerable non-clinical impacts as described in its report.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The group on Hepatitis C unanimously favoured people with chronic Hepatitis C, including those who had cleared their virus through treatment, or their widows, widowers or partners who were eligible for support being asked to self-declare Hepatitis C impact.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The approach in Scotland was entirely based on trusting the judgement of the potential applicant, and there was no need for a healthcare professional to be involved.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
The Review Group recommended that provision should be made for those under the scheme as "Stage one" recipients to self-assess as minimally affected, moderately affected or severely affected.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2220
Page
2221
Page
2222
Page
2223
Current page
2224
Page
2225
Page
2226
Page
2227
Page
2228
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last