Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
Compensation Framework Study
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
The Inquiry Report
Publication Day
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Confidential Psychological Support
Interim Payments
Support Groups
Get in touch
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Treatment and aftercare
Medical Evidence
Expenses Guidance
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
Su Gorman told the Inquiry that she found the wording of the EIBSS forms she had to complete insensitive.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
A witness infected with Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C described the means tested nature of the EIBSS financial assistance as 'disgusting'.
Published on:
30 July, 2024
Simon Gittins described the day-to-day operations of EIBSS as 'unreliable' upon receiving incorrect payments with no guarantee of future payments.
Published on:
17 October, 2024
The Belfast Regional Transfusion Centre began storing donor serum samples. Dr Morris McClelland explained to the Inquiry that this was influenced by Edinburgh.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Morris McClelland did not consider producing an AIDS leaflet for Belfast. He was aware a national leaflet was being produced and thought it was appropriate to follow the national approach.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
According to Dr Morris McClelland's recollection, an amended questionnaire with a question along the lines of "Have you read the AIDS leaflet" was introduced.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
A questionnaire asking donors if they had read the AIDS leaflet was expected to be introduced but was not made available by the Department of Health.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
The armed forces were a source of blood donors. Dr Colin Entwistle described these military sessions as "incredibly beneficial" and did not perceive military donors to impose particular extra risks.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Generally, between 100 and 200 donors would be bled at each session. According to Dr Entwistle, at Oxford about 50% of around 200 donors called would attend plus around 10% walk-ins and at a Cambridge military session there may be as many as 240 donors.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Each blood donor would be booked in by a member of the clerical staff who should have had a copy of (and/or received training on) the most up-to-date national guidelines produced by the regional transfusion directors, and donors would be given written material on arrival, which set out the eligibility criteria.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
In his oral evidence, Dr Colin Entwistle accepted that discussions about whether or not the donor might have an infectious disease would in effect be taking place in public in an "open forum".
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Colin Entwistle was elected to serve on the care and selection of donors working party by the western division of the regional transfusion centres and tasked with producing the guidelines for donor exclusion. According to Dr Entwistle, the guidelines were "a common agreed policy which everyone can agree to" and were not to be seen as a record of best practice.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Colin Entwistle, director of the Oxford Centre, did not consider the education of his colleagues on the use of blood to be part of his role.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
According to Dr Colin Entwistle's oral evidence, the haematologists in the Oxford region used to meet every three months or so, which provided a good opportunity for face-to-face discussions.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Colin Entwistle told the Inquiry that Oxford could have switched from providing plasma to the Blood Product Laboratory to producing cryoprecipitate in a matter of days.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Colin Entwistle was aware that the question of infection with the AIDS virus was associated with transmission via blood in some form.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
At Oxford (and in common with most regional transfusion centres), in the period leading up to production of the first AIDS leaflet in September 1983, no particular steps were in place to screen out high-risk AIDS donors.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Once the AIDS leaflets were available, they were put on display at donor sessions but not sent out with the call-up cards. Dr Colin Entwistle suggested this was "not the most appropriate way, not least because that would not cater for the walk-in donors."
Published on:
25 July, 2024
The Oxford Centre held a stock of 13,000 leaflets, had issued approximately 1,000, and had a "now negligible" rate of usage per month, meaning that donors were not picking up and removing the leaflets from where they were displayed.
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Dr Patricia Hewitt wrote to Dr Roger Moore, stating that the North London Blood Transfusion Centre did not supply blood to any military hospitals but did "collect a large number of donations from MOD establishments".
Published on:
25 July, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2274
Page
2275
Page
2276
Page
2277
Current page
2278
Page
2279
Page
2280
Page
2281
Page
2282
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last