Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Inquiry Memorial
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
The Inquiry Report
Additional Compensation Report
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
Compensation Framework Study
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Support and FAQs
NHS Psychological Support
Support Groups
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Hepatitis C Testing
Contact us
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
In a memo from Dr Rejman to John Canavan, he expressed his views on compensation for infected and affected persons including wives who had put themselves at risk against medical advice and having cut off points for claims.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Richard Gutowski confirmed in his written statement his concerns and comments had fed into Charles Dobson's submission about the HIV litigation.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Linda Page had been assigned a specific project following the publication of the "Self-Sufficiency in Blood Products in England and Wales: A Chronology from 1973 to 1991" which was published in 2006.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
The project objectives for Linda Page to follow were to "Assess and report on documents relating to previous Government policy on the safe use of imported and domestic blood products during the period 1970 to 1985 when BPL commenced general issue of 8Y heat-treated factor VIII. Specifically the inactivation of blood products for NANBH."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
The "Independent Public Inquiry Report on NHS Supplied Contaminated Blood and Blood Products" had stated that the Department of Health needed to be able to interact with an inquiry chaired by Lord Archer of Sandwell (the "Archer Inquiry").
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In an email exchange from Charles Lister he had noted that documents kept by private offices were never held onto when there was a change in government and either handed back or shredded.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Charles Lister had explained to Zubeda Seedat that "Unfortunately, none of the key submissions to Ministers about self sufficiency from the 70s/early 80s appear to have survived".
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Charles Lister confirmed in an email to Zubeda Seedat that the self sufficiency report had not included investigation into into the destruction of Lord Owen's papers.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In an email Charles Lister provided some insight into Lord Owen's "allegation about pulped papers" and how the government would not keep papers after a change and so they were most likely shredded.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In a memo Richard Gutowski noted that official papers (namely, "the key submissions to Ministers about self sufficiency") had also been destroyed.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In a written statement to the Infected Blood Inquiry, Zubeda Seedat confirmed that the role had been a higher executive officer within the Blood Policy Team.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In a written statement, Zubeda Seedat confirmed that many freedom of access searches had been required as well as searching for documents required for the project that Linda Page had been working on in regard to self-sufficiency.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In an email exchange between Michelle Lucas and Andrew Faulkner it was stated that questions had come from a Freedom of Information request.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In a briefing paper on the Freedom of Information request it had given an explanation that papers marked for public interest immunity during the discovery process on the HIV litigation had been destroyed in error at some time in the mid 1990s.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
An email from Mike Patrick to Zubeda Seedat confirmed that it was not unlikely given the duration of time that the documents requested in the Freedom of Information request had been destroyed considering the fact that litigation had been settled over 15 years ago.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Charles Lister and Anita James concluded that, following the discovery that the documents had been destroyed, she would say an audit had been done by a junior official at the Department of Health who no longer worked there.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Michelle Haywood and William Connon emailed to explore the possibility of further searches of records at archives.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Records held by the Department of Health were destroyed in the early nineties because they had been given a short destruction date.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
A review was conducted of documentation regarding governmental policy in relation to the safety of blood products.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Documents held by the claimants' solicitors, Blackett Hart & Pratt Solicitors, in the HIV litigation were returned in the week of 19 May 2006.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2287
Page
2288
Page
2289
Page
2290
Current page
2291
Page
2292
Page
2293
Page
2294
Page
2295
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last