Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Inquiry Memorial
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
The Inquiry Report
Additional Compensation Report
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
Compensation Framework Study
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Support and FAQs
NHS Psychological Support
Support Groups
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Hepatitis C Testing
Contact us
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
A memo regarding the discovery of documents in the HIV/haemophilia litigation noted that copies of Public Expenditure Survey bids from 1975 to 1986 were not held, and that it was understood that many (if not all) of these papers had been destroyed.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Roger Williams (expert at the DHSS) noted regarding the minutes of the Hepatitis Advisory Board (of which he was a member): "I have checked this out with administrators who believe that all these minutes have been destroyed".
Published on:
20 September, 2024
A memo noted that file 00134/0007 which was assumed destroyed (and therefore not included in the original list of documents to be disclosed) suddenly materialised.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Anita James noted in a minute to the Permanent Secretary, Chris Kelly, that when litigation was contemplated in the mid 90s, Justin Fenwick QC had advised the Department of Health to "be prepared".
Published on:
20 September, 2024
A term of the settlement agreement recorded that all documents given to the plaintiffs by any defendant should be returned or destroyed within 28 days of settlement.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
John Canavan wrote regarding a request made by solicitors to use information from the HIV litigation in HIV infection via blood transfusion litigation and confirmed agreement that there would be "nothing to be gained by objecting".
Published on:
20 September, 2024
John Canavan wrote regarding HIV litigation documents being passed between solicitors firms: "I am concerned that we should keep firm control over who has access to the haemophilia litigation documents, as provided under the terms of settlement."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
A file note about the telephone attendance of solicitor acting for the CBLA with the plaintiff solicitor, Tony Mallen, noted that in relation to hepatitis claims: "no Plaintiffs have any claim against the CBLA."
Published on:
20 September, 2024
A court order allowed plaintiffs in the HIV litigation to use the documents disclosed by defendants to make claims in respect of hepatitis infections.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Andrzej Rejman asked John Canavan and Ronald Powell to ensure that any papers in respect of public interest immunity disclosures were kept secure and not destroyed.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In a written statement, Carol Grayson stated that she gained access to Department of Health files disclosed during the HIV litigation and kept by the plaintiffs' solicitors.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Andrzej Rejman was a senior medical officer for haematology at the Department of Health.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
John Canavan was the head of the Department of Health section responsible for blood policy and the administrative secretary to the ACVSB.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In the article "Testing Blood Donors for Non-A, Non-B Hepatitis: Irrational Perhaps But Inescapable" published in "The Lancet" in 1987, Professor Cash and other SNBTS regional transfusion directors foresaw the possibility of litigation under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 and similar European laws.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In an internal memo it was asked for ACVSB papers to be retrieved to see whether an estimate was made of the numbers of people who might have been saved from Hepatitis C infections.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
In an internal memo Roger Scofield sought to initiate a discovery process to ascertain whether the Department of Health acted negligently in relation to blood supply and Hepatitis C infections.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Charles Blake had been asked to make an assessment of the Department's liability in relation to Hepatitis C, but that "the papers we have do not assist us" and that a chronology of events or a "medical history" was required in order to do so.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Roger Scofield identified the need to look for papers which related to possible negligence claims and that might "ridicule" the Department if exposed in public.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Rejman said it would be helpful to have departmental agreement on the "rules for discovering" the relevant papers.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Dr Rejman sent a memo to Roger Scofield expressing his reluctance to undertake litigation discovery work without a formal instruction from Dr Metters.
Published on:
20 September, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2299
Page
2300
Page
2301
Page
2302
Current page
2303
Page
2304
Page
2305
Page
2306
Page
2307
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last