Subscribe to Search results

It was suggested that the Government would respond to the Archer report when they had given the report the consideration it deserved.

Published on:

Dawn Primarolo had answered a Parliamentary Question regarding compensation for people with haemophilia who had been infected.

Published on:

A briefing had been given by Dr Rowena Jecock ahead of the planned meeting between Lord Archer, Dawn Primarolo and Alan Johnson.

Published on:

An email from Penelope Irwin had asked ministers for further advice regarding the different schemes and any alternatives to adopting Lord Archer's recommendations and to reassess financial relief for those affected.

Published on:

Lord Morris had made an amendment to the Health Bill to establish a committee as Lord Archer had recommended.

Published on:

A memo from Dr Jecock to Alan Johnson and Dawn Primarolo stated that the proposed amendment by Lord Morris, to establish a committee as Lord Archer had recommended, had been withdrawn.

Published on:

An email from Morven Smith to Brian Bradley outlined Baroness Primarolo's thinking about the different schemes and the proposal to do away with discretionary payments.

Published on:

Inquiry publishes interim report

Published on:

A further update was provided to the team by Dr Jecock regarding the proposal to do away with discretionary payments, among other things.

Published on:

In an email from Morven Smith, he wrote on behalf of Baroness Primarolo asking those for proposals for options of dealing with Lord Archer's recommendations.

Published on:

Liz Woodeson had sent a response to Baroness Primarolo that addressed Lord Archer's recommendations with options.

Published on:

Morven Smith commented on Liz Woodeson's options to Baroness Primarolo with a comment that "These responses to recommendations seem much more robust and better incorporate your preferences." Baroness Primarolo later wrote "agreed" on the document.

Published on:

It had been confirmed in an email from Dr Jecock to Morven Smith that Dr Jecock had explained the difficulties that the report by Lord Archer had created for the Health Bill.

Published on:

Jenny Willott MP asked a parliamentary question on the timetable and mechanism for responding to the Archer report recommendations and Dawn Primarolo replied that they were receiving careful consideration and there would be a response in due course.

Published on:

A briefing pack was prepared for a debate which was to be held in the House of Lords on a motion proposed by Lord Morris to call attention to the findings of the Archer Inquiry.

Published on:

A debate was held in the House of Lords on a motion proposed by Lord Morris to call attention to the findings of the Archer Inquiry.

Published on:

Lord Morris moved his amendment to the Health Bill during its report stage.

Published on:

Lord Morris agreed to withdraw his amendment upon Lord Ara Darzi's undertaking to do everything possible to ensure that the Government responded fully to Lord Archer's recommendations before the Whitsun recess.

Published on:

Dr Gunson advised all regional transfusion centre directors that no blood products should be issued from repeatedly ELISA-positive donations.

Published on:

At an ACVSB meeting it was again agreed that surrogate screening should not be introduced before the results of the multi-centre study were available.

Published on: