Subscribe to Search results

A Caxton Foundation Q&A document stated that it was possible to visit the Alliance House office without prior arrangement.

Published on:

The Macfarlane Trust's business case noted that administrative and management costs would be greater if economies of scale were not available.

Published on:

Time constraints meant that the Caxton Foundation had to be set up on an 'England only' basis.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation carried out a survey of registrants. Just over half of those who registered and returned the census form had income which fell below what was recognised as the poverty line.

Published on:

The directors of the Caxton Foundation decided to make the winter fuel payment to all primary beneficiaries and widows.

Published on:

Complaints were raised with Anna Soubry MP by a number of beneficiaries of the Caxton Foundation.

Published on:

Peter Stevens and Charles Lister wrote a paper outlining why a beneficiary trustee should not be appointed to the board of directors of the Caxton Foundation.

Published on:

It was recommended that Caxton Foundation clients have the option of receiving vouchers or have the Foundation pay suppliers directly.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation Partnership Group held their first meeting, at which it was noted the office guidelines could not be published on the website.

Published on:

The Board of Directors of Caxton Trustee Limited was told that there were no fixed criteria in relation to household income when considering grant applications, and that each case was considered on its individual merits.

Published on:

The legal adviser to the Caxton Foundation approved the provision of services to the Skipton Fund and the Macfarlane Trust.

Published on:

In a draft email to Martin Harvey, Jonathan Stopes-Roe expressed the Department of Health's "principles that economy and efficiency should be the watchwords; and that money spent on admin is money not available for charitable benefits."

Published on:

Jan Barlow did not see any conflict in being chief executive of both the Caxton Foundation and the Macfarlane Trust.

Published on:

Jan Barlow told the Inquiry that when the Caxton Foundation was introduced there had just been one additional staff member who had been brought on to the team to deal with the daily administration.

Published on:

Vouchers as means of grant aid were phased out after Jan Barlow took over as chief executive of the Caxton Foundation.

Published on:

Jan Barlow told the Inquiry that the Caxton Foundation was a much more efficient organisation in 2018 compared to 2013 in terms of turnaround time for grants.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation abandoned the annual census (which usefulness was questioned by Jan Barlow) until it was reintroduced with the regular payment scheme.

Published on:

Membership of the Caxton Foundation Partnership Group was broadened to include beneficiaries who weren't campaigners.

Published on:

The Caxton Foundation operated a policy of presenting a request to the National Welfare Committee in situations where a beneficiary had already had in excess of £3,000 in grants. Jan Barlow explained that this information fed into other considerations such as the development of the regular payments scheme.

Published on:

Some members of the Contaminated Blood Campaign group visited Alliance House and were described by Foundation officials as having barged in with the intention to shock and intimidate.

Published on: