Subscribe to Search results

William Connon, Head of Blood Policy, was asked to respond to correspondence from Carol Grayson, a campaigner, regarding an 'informal internal report'. He asked Zubeda Seedat to "see if you can identify which report the person is referring to".

Published on:

In a submission to Sir Nigel Crisp, who was about to meet with Lord Charles Jenkin, William Connon wrote "The report is now complete and a submission is in preparation for PS(PH) on handling and making the results of the analysis of the papers public".

Published on:

Zubeda Seedat sent a version of the Self-Sufficiency Report to Peter Burgin and described it as "final". Peter Burgin reviewed it and made some minor comments.

Published on:

Draft submission by William Connon regarding the Self-Sufficiency Report.

Published on:

William Connon, Head of Blood Policy, circulated the draft Self-Sufficiency Report to officials in the Scottish Government.

Published on:

William Connon, Head of Blood Policy, prepared a submission for the Minister regarding the Self-Sufficiency Report.

Published on:

Zubeda Seedat told the Private Secretary to the Under-Secretary of State for Public Health the publication of the Self-Sufficiency Report was further delayed until 16 February 2006.

Published on:

Zubeda Seedat updated the Under-Secretary of State for Public Health that the publication of the Self-Sufficiency Report had been moved back to 27 February 2006.

Published on:

A submission was put up to the Minister so that media handling around the publication of the Self-Sufficiency Report could be agreed.

Published on:

Richard Gutowski, Head of Blood Policy, forwarded a document to Graham Buckler which was purported to be a note of a meeting of haemophilia centre directors, at which the DHSS was present, which took place in 1982. Richard Gutowski said the note "supposedly records that the existence of non-B and Non-A hepatitis in the blood supply was known at the time and that it was serious enough to warrant monitoring."

Published on:

Dr Shanida Nataraja, a junior medical writer at Dianthus Medical Ltd, was appointed by Dr Adam Jacobs to undertake the work on the Self-Sufficiency Report.

Published on:

A further draft version of England and Wales Self-Sufficiency in Blood Products: Chronology from 1973 to 1985 did not have an executive summary. It was saved in a folder called "Work in Progress".

Published on:

By this date the Christmas Eve version (Peter Burgin's version) of the Self-Sufficiency Report had been referenced, all bar some 26 matters.

Published on:

The 13 July version of England and Wales Self-Sufficiency in Blood Products: Chronology from 1973 to 1985 contained a note referring to the need to add information about surrogate testing for Non-A, Non-B Hepatitis, as well as first, second and third-generation tests.

Published on:

The original report by Peter Burgin had spoken of Professor Zuckerman's warning, in the 1975 TV programme about the risks of hepatitis from commercial concentrates, that hepatitis linked to factor concentrates could lead to cirrhosis and liver cancer, however, the Dianthus version left this entire paragraph out.

Published on:

The draft executive summary of the Self-Sufficiency report was a separate document in the "Work in Progress" folder.

Published on:

A version of the report identified as Annotation of Draft Report on Self-Sufficiency in Blood Products was located in a folder called "Previous Versions". This contained comments by Dr Hugh Nicholas, the senior medical officer in the Health Protection Division.

Published on:

Dr Hugh Nicholas, the senior medical officer in the Health Protection Division, commented on the August version (Dianthus version) of the Self -Sufficiency report, observing one thing that frequently seemed to be missing were the actual views of the Department of Health.

Published on:

In response to the view in the draft report that doctors treating haemophiliacs explained the risk of viral infection, Dr Hugh Nicholas observed that could be construed as contentious by patients who had not had all of the relevant risks explained to them.

Published on:

Dr Shanida Nataraja responded to Dr Hugh Nicholas's comments on the draft report.

Published on: