Subscribe to Search results

The Department of Health were unable to find John Moore's response to what had happened to the extra money he had allocated in 1975 for self-sufficiency of blood products. However, "Lord Owen is quoted as saying that he was told that papers had been destroyed."

Published on:

It appeared that there was no further contact from Lord Owen about his pulped papers until 2006.

Published on:

Lord Owen believed that the note by Mr Slater about destroyed papers, was almost certainly written in January 1988.

Published on:

Carol Grayson wrote to Yvette Cooper and expressed issues related to self-sufficiency. She noted that Lord Owen had been told that his files had been "'pulped'".

Published on:

Yvette Cooper did not dismiss the allegations that Lord Owen's documents had obviously been disposed of in the normal course of business as a misunderstanding.

Published on:

Yvette Cooper questioned where Lord Owen's papers were.

Published on:

Yvette Cooper commissioned a detailed review of the surviving papers of Lord Owen.

Published on:

Yvette Cooper believed that the Self-Sufficiency Report should have addressed the missing documents and "given detailed advice about what papers had been destroyed."

Published on:

The self-sufficiency report work began after Yvette Cooper had left office in the Department of Health.

Published on:

Peter Burgin was clear that he was not asked to address the destruction of Lord Owen's papers in his original draft.

Published on:

Lord Owen had sought his Private Office papers but had been informed they had been pulped on the basis of a "bizarre" ten year destruction rule.

Published on:

Zubeda Seedat forwarded a parliamentary question from Lord Clement Jones to Charles Lister, asking what review had been undertaken into the circumstances of Lord Owen's missing files. In response, Charles Lister told Zubeda Seedat that the self-sufficiency report would not cover this issue.

Published on:

Robert Finch stated in his evidence to the Inquiry that he understood the papers kept by the private office were typically shredded or handed back to the relevant policy section and were never retained after a change of Government.

Published on:

Michael Lillywhite, then Principal Private Secretary to Dr David Owen during his time as Minister of Health, recalled that the procedure was that if there was a change of government then the papers would have been sent back to the relevant policy team.

Published on:

Robert Finch emailed Vicki King and Richard Gutowski after they briefed Melanie Johnson as Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Public Health, with the following recorded "Lord Owen: Not a priority".

Published on:

In a letter to Rt Hon John Reid regarding the decision to make compensation available to people with haemophilia who contracted HIV through infected blood products, David Owen referred to the internal investigation regarding ministerial papers going missing.

Published on:

In an internal Department of Health email chain, Robert Finch wrote to Zubeda Seedat and Jill Taylor requesting them to prepare a short note to PS(PH) regarding Lord Owen's allegations regarding destruction of papers and "how to take forward without it looking quite bad".

Published on:

Richard Gutowski prepared a memo to PS(PH) with a draft letter for approval in response to Lord Owen about the Hepatitis C payment scheme and the review of internal papers between 1973 and 1985.

Published on:

Zubeda Seedat confirmed in a memo to Caroline Flint that while it might be practice to send private office papers to the DRO, her understanding was that private office papers at that time were either destroyed or returned to the policy section after a change in Government.

Published on:

An internal Department of Health email chain questioned why the devolved administrations were not checked with when it was found that some files had been destroyed and why plasma sources were not taken from US prisoners.

Published on: