Subscribe to Search results

Meeting held between Malcolm Chisholm, representatives from the financial services sector and representatives from the Scottish Haemophilia Groups Forum and Scottish Hepatitis C Group.

Published on:

Lord Ross and Philip Dolan gave evidence to the Health and Community Care Committee in support of the Expert Group's preliminary report.

Published on:

Prior to Malcolm Chisholm's appearance before the Health and Community Care Committee he was provided with a briefing, including lines to take.

Published on:

Robert Stock provided a submission that costed a scheme on the basis of making lump sum payments of £20,000 to all those who had Hepatitis C - with a further £25,000 to those who had cirrhosis, liver cancer or liver failure.

Published on:

Malcolm Chisholm put forward the proposal set out in Robert Stack's submission, with the First Minister's agreement, to the Health and Community Care Committee. The position in Ireland was distinguished on the ground that there was fault in Ireland but "no fault here."

Published on:

The perspective of a transfusion recipient involved in the work undertaken by the Ross group was that the recommendations "were then almost completely ignored by the then Health Minister Malcolm Chisholm and Scottish Government" with responsibility for financial payments transferred back to Westminster.

Published on:

An analysis called "The Ross Report: 10 years on" showed how many of Lord Ross's recommendations were not implemented.

Published on:

The new Secretary of State for Health, John Reid, made the decision that some form of payments should be made in England to those infected with Hepatitis C.

Published on:

Letter from John Reid to Malcolm Chisholm confirmed that Scotland's proposed scheme was accepted as being within devolved competence, and that officials in England and Scotland would work together over the summer on the scope of the scheme.

Published on:

The Department of Health was regarded as very concerned that developments did not leak out prior to the joint ministerial announcement, and believed that the proposal not to make payments to the dependants, relatives or estates of deceased patients "may well be contentious."

Published on:

An email chain reported the outcome of the telephone conversation between John Reid and Malcolm Chisholm regarding the Hepatitis C ex gratia payment scheme.

Published on:

Malcolm Chisholm was asked about the difference between the payments being made in Ireland and those proposed for Scotland. He said that in Ireland the Government had agreed that "wrongful practices were used" and that the payments in Ireland were compensation. "We", he said, "are making an ex gratia payment."

Published on:

A briefing for a meeting between Malcolm Chisholm and Philip Dolan referred to the need to weigh the issue of making a fair and reasonable payment against all the other demands on the health budget.

Published on:

Andy Kerr, Minister for Health and Community Care, asked Roseanna Cunningham, Convenor of the Health Committee, to reconsider the decision regarding the call for a public inquiry.

Published on:

Advice from officials in Scotland to Scottish ministers continued to be "very strongly against holding a public inquiry."

Published on:

In his evidence to the Inquiry, Professor Ludlam was asked about a view attributed to him that until the late 1980s the perception was that non-A non-B Hepatitis was a mild non-progressive condition. Professor Ludlam said that this was an "inaccurate summary of my perceptions" and that mid rather than late 1980s would be a more accurate reflection of his views.

Published on:

Jenni Richards KC

Published on:

Within her written statement to the Inquiry, Jane Ellison described how Scotland preferred to make different choices on scheme reform

Published on:

Letter from campaigners and charities to Theresa May requested that similar payment uplifts be made across all of the devolved nations

Published on:

Within the four Nation Ministerial teleconference commitment was made to achieving parity of support and an agreement that each nation should give one another due warning of any intended changes to support provided

Published on: