Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation Hide — Main navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • The Chair
    • Inquiry Team
    • Expert Groups
    • Inquiry Intermediaries
    • Core Participants
    • Legal Representatives
    • Financial Reports
  • Approach
    • Terms of reference
    • List of Issues
    • Statements of approach
    • Inquiry Principles
  • News
    • News
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Reports
    • Compensation Framework Study
    • First Interim Report
    • Second Interim Report
    • The Inquiry Report
  • Evidence
    • Evidence
    • Hearings Archive
  • Compensation
  • Support
    • NHS Psychological Support
    • Confidential Psychological Support
    • Support Groups
    • Infected Blood Support Schemes
    • Treatment and aftercare
    • Medical Evidence
    • Expenses Guidance
  • Contact us
Accessibility Tool
  • Zoom in
  • Zoom out
  • Reset
  • Contrast
  • Accessibility tool
Get in touch

Quick Exit

Subscribe to Search results

An article was published called Interim Results of Surveillance for NANBH in Patients Receiving Heated Concentrates Produced in England Developments in Biologicals.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

The Haemophilia Society continued to push for a full public inquiry to ensure all the central concerns of those affected were dealt with.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Christine Dora sent an email to Susan Deacon, Dr Keel and other officials to report a conversation which she had had with Charles Lister at the Department of Health, which indicated that Lord Philip Hunt inclined towards sympathy for "the plight of the affected haemophiliacs" and had agreed to meet Lord Alf Morris to revisit the idea of compensation. Susan Deacon was very concerned about this.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

The existing policy of not compensating haemophiliacs with HCV was adhered to by Lord Hunt, in response to which it was recorded that Susan Deacon "will be vvv relieved!"

Published on: 11 October, 2024

The Scottish Parliament received a petition on Hepatitis C, which called for the establishment of a system of compensation.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

The Scottish Parliament received a petition on Hepatitis C, which called for an independent inquiry.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

After the judgment in A and Others v National Blood Authority, Susan Deacon wrote to Lord Hunt to urge the Department of Health/National Blood Authority to seek permission to appeal the decision.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Lord Hunt informed Susan Deacon that the Department of Health had decided "reluctantly" not to appeal the decision in A and Others v National Blood Authority.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

A debate took place in the Scottish Parliament on a motion in support of compensation for people infected with Hepatitis C.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Health and Community Care Committee, Susan Deacon told John Hutton, Minister of State at the Department of Health, that "We will hold the current view" - of no compensation - "and try and sustain it as best we can".

Published on: 31 July, 2024

A submission was provided to the First Minister, recommending that the Health and Community Care Committee's recommendations be rejected and that instead the Executive should offer to set up an expert group to examine whether the general principle of offering financial and practical support was right and practicable.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

During oral evidence Michael Chisholm accepted that non-A non-B Hepatitis was not an unknown risk.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Malcolm Chisholm, who had replaced Susan Deacon as Minister for Health and Community Care by this date, stated that the Executive response appeared to rule out financial compensation, however it was justified in order to avoid "establishing a new, wide-ranging precedent on compensation."

Published on: 31 July, 2024

The Scottish Executive provided a Report on Hepatitis C in response to the Health and Community Care Committee.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Robert Stock, head of the Scottish Executive's ancillary services branch, felt that the Expert Group on Financial and Other Support had omitted to take into account aspects of their terms of reference.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

A Cabinet paper recorded that Malcolm Chisholm did not feel it would be right to accept the recommendation of the Expert Group as it stood.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Malcolm Chisholm concluded that accepting the Expert Group's recommendation in principle with a reduced scope was the 'least bad option'.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

In an email from Sammy Sinclair to Charles Lister, Malcolm Chisholm was described as feeling as though he had to offer payments to people once they become seriously ill.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Letter from Malcolm Chisholm to Andrew Smith, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, asked whether payments were within devolved competence and if social security legislation required amendment to disregard any payments that the Scottish Executive might decide to make.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

The Scottish Executive's response to the Expert Group's preliminary report was announced.

Published on: 31 July, 2024

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Previous
  • …
  • Page 2285
  • Page 2286
  • Page 2287
  • Page 2288
  • Current page 2289
  • Page 2290
  • Page 2291
  • Page 2292
  • Page 2293
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Inquiry

  • Home
  • About
  • Approach
  • Participate
  • News
  • Evidence
  • Support
  • Get in touch

Legal

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility tool

Address

Infected Blood Inquiry
5th Floor
Aldwych House
71-91 Aldwych
London
WC2B 4HN
 
Images of individuals on the website are used with the agreement of those featured or are stock images.

Follow us

© Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.