Subscribe to Search results

It was recorded by Andrew Collins QC regarding the HIV haemophilia litigation that: "We must stop destruction on the date the litigation comes on. Hepatitis virtually nothing. Most of it has already been destructed."

Published on:

In a written statement, Justin Fenwick QC stated that both he and Andrew Collins were likely to have advised that all documents that still existed and were relevant must be preserved until the conclusion of the litigation, and that routine document destruction policies should therefore be suspended within the Department of Health.

Published on:

A memo regarding the discovery of documents in the HIV/haemophilia litigation noted that copies of Public Expenditure Survey bids from 1975 to 1986 were not held, and that it was understood that many (if not all) of these papers had been destroyed.

Published on:

Dr Roger Williams (expert at the DHSS) noted regarding the minutes of the Hepatitis Advisory Board (of which he was a member): "I have checked this out with administrators who believe that all these minutes have been destroyed".

Published on:

A memo noted that file 00134/0007 which was assumed destroyed (and therefore not included in the original list of documents to be disclosed) suddenly materialised.

Published on:

Anita James noted in a minute to the Permanent Secretary, Chris Kelly, that when litigation was contemplated in the mid 90s, Justin Fenwick QC had advised the Department of Health to "be prepared".

Published on:

A term of the settlement agreement recorded that all documents given to the plaintiffs by any defendant should be returned or destroyed within 28 days of settlement.

Published on:

It was noted in a memo that various legal firms acting for plaintiffs proposed to retain documents (contrary to the settlement agreement) for use in HIV transfusion litigation which remained afoot.

Published on:

John Canavan wrote regarding a request made by solicitors to use information from the HIV litigation in HIV infection via blood transfusion litigation and confirmed agreement that there would be "nothing to be gained by objecting".

Published on:

John Canavan wrote regarding HIV litigation documents being passed between solicitors firms: "I am concerned that we should keep firm control over who has access to the haemophilia litigation documents, as provided under the terms of settlement."

Published on:

Solicitor acting for CBLA advised that documents disclosed by the CBLA to plaintiffs during the HIV litigation had subsequently been sent by Pannone Napier to another law firm, J Keith Park & Co, in contravention of the settlement agreement.

Published on:

A file note about the telephone attendance of solicitor acting for the CBLA with the plaintiff solicitor, Tony Mallen, noted that in relation to hepatitis claims: "no Plaintiffs have any claim against the CBLA."

Published on:

A court order allowed plaintiffs in the HIV litigation to use the documents disclosed by defendants to make claims in respect of hepatitis infections.

Published on:

Dr Andrzej Rejman asked John Canavan and Ronald Powell to ensure that any papers in respect of public interest immunity disclosures were kept secure and not destroyed.

Published on:

In a written statement, Carol Grayson stated that she gained access to Department of Health files disclosed during the HIV litigation and kept by the plaintiffs' solicitors.

Published on:

Dr Andrzej Rejman was a senior medical officer for haematology at the Department of Health.

Published on:

John Canavan was the head of the Department of Health section responsible for blood policy and the administrative secretary to the ACVSB.

Published on:

In the article "Testing Blood Donors for Non-A, Non-B Hepatitis: Irrational Perhaps But Inescapable" published in "The Lancet" in 1987, Professor Cash and other SNBTS regional transfusion directors foresaw the possibility of litigation under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 and similar European laws.

Published on:

In an internal memo it was asked for ACVSB papers to be retrieved to see whether an estimate was made of the numbers of people who might have been saved from Hepatitis C infections.

Published on:

In an internal memo Roger Scofield sought to initiate a discovery process to ascertain whether the Department of Health acted negligently in relation to blood supply and Hepatitis C infections.

Published on: