Skip to main content
Show — Main navigation
Hide — Main navigation
Home
About
The Chair
Inquiry Team
Expert Groups
Inquiry Intermediaries
Core Participants
Legal Representatives
Inquiry Memorial
Financial Reports
Approach
Terms of reference
List of Issues
Statements of approach
Inquiry Principles
News
News
Newsletter Archive
Reports
The Inquiry Report
Additional Compensation Report
First Interim Report
Second Interim Report
Compensation Framework Study
Evidence
Evidence
Hearings Archive
Compensation
Support
Support and FAQs
NHS Psychological Support
Support Groups
Infected Blood Support Schemes
Hepatitis C Testing
Contact us
Search
Accessibility Tool
Zoom in
Zoom out
Reset
Contrast
Accessibility tool
Listen
Get in touch
Quick Exit
Subscribe to Search results
Search
Sort your search results
Relevance
Title
Changed
The team focused on Hepatitis C in the Haemophilia Society declared that hepatitis was not a major concern for the Society. Simon Taylor stated in his evidence to the Inquiry that the Society relied on information from Dr Hay who stated that Hepatitis C was not a concern and Professor Preston's concerns were largely ignored.
Published on:
24 July, 2024
During oral evidence Penny Mordaunt stated she raised the issue of compensation in her letter dated 13 July 2020 so that all government departments were "aware of what is likely to need to happen and prepare for that." She wanted to give the Treasury "some encouragement to grip the issue".
Published on:
29 July, 2024
During oral evidence Penny Mordaunt explained she did not receive a written response to her letter dated 13 July 2020.
Published on:
29 July, 2024
During oral evidence Penny Mordaunt explained it was her expectation that the Government's response to the study commissioned in 2021 to consider a framework for compensation would be published and shared with the Inquiry.
Published on:
29 July, 2024
During oral evidence Penny Mordaunt agreed that if the acceptance of a moral case for compensation was not followed by action in providing compensation then the Government was not putting it right.
Published on:
29 July, 2024
During oral evidence Penny Mordaunt described the issue of compensation as "absolutely unprecedented, the length of time that people have had to wait...and things that people have had to deal with that are very difficult to understand."
Published on:
29 July, 2024
The Inquiry indicated that a second interim report will be published.
Published on:
22 July, 2024
The Inquiry confirmed that a second interim report would be published.
Published on:
29 July, 2024
Dr Dempsey continued to use SNBTS concentrates until he became aware of the infection of patients in Edinburgh. He used the heat-treated product NY until July 1987 when the next generation product Z8 became available. He was aware that non-A non-B Hepatitis could still be transmitted by NY.
Published on:
02 October, 2024
Dr Dempsey would not have used concentrate at all "given what was likely - or what was going to happen further down the road." The NHS product might have been a "better modality of treatment" to have employed back in 1981.
Published on:
02 October, 2024
Dr Mark Winter said in oral evidence that Dr Preston's 1978 paper about liver disease in people with haemophilia in The Lancet "blew out of the water instantly the idea that this [non-A non-B Hepatitis] was nothing to worry about because their study showed, as did other studies, that most of these patients had very significant chronic liver disease".
Published on:
07 August, 2024
In his oral evidence, Dr Winter agreed that whilst cryoprecipitate was more laborious to use, it could be used, and had been used, to raise Factor 8 levels. Side effects were for the most part transient.
Published on:
08 August, 2024
Dr Mark Winter (who regularly read the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) told the Inquiry that: "Any clinician looking at this data would have to believe that AIDS was a transmissible disorder and that it could be transmitted by blood and by blood products."
Published on:
19 August, 2024
Dr Mark Winter in his oral evidence to the Inquiry described two cases demonstrating how some people with haemophilia were treated elsewhere than at haemophilia centres and the consequences of treatment in such circumstances where those treating might have had limited understanding of the risks of treatment.
Published on:
24 September, 2024
Dr Winter described how the 1978 Sheffield study showed NANBH to be a really serious evolving clinical problem.
Published on:
27 September, 2024
Dr Winter described how at the around when the Sheffield study took place most clinicians seemed to ignore the issue of NANBH as blood products has brought such miraculous results and so the issues seemed to outweigh the benefits.
Published on:
27 September, 2024
Dr Winter stated that that the Preston paper was a key moment as the general attitude moved from mild to very concerned.
Published on:
27 September, 2024
In oral evidence Dr Mark Winter described how in the 1980s, despite the growing concern of the hepatitis virus, treatment with factor concentrates continued unabated.
Published on:
27 September, 2024
With respect to the growing prevalence of AIDS and the response of UKHCDO, Dr Winter explained how the issue with blood products was that there were constantly new viruses being discovered.
Published on:
27 September, 2024
Dr Winter described how the San Francisco cases in 1982 led to the start of haemophilia doctors understanding they were dealing with a transmissible blood disease.
Published on:
27 September, 2024
Pagination
First page
First
Previous page
Previous
…
Page
2371
Page
2372
Page
2373
Page
2374
Current page
2375
Page
2376
Page
2377
Page
2378
Page
2379
…
Next page
Next
Last page
Last