Subscribe to Search results

In a note to Morven Smith, Dawn Primarolo wrote "It is clearly not acceptable in such tragic & unique circumstances for DH [the Department of Health] to claim no liability and no more money to Trust."

Published on:

A note from Dawn Primarolo's Private Secretary documenting a discussion between them, recorded "Proper Report ASAP", "what's in place 2 never happen again?" and "much clearer how much + why fund."

Published on:

In a note to Dr Rowena Jecock, Morven Smith wrote that the Minister of State for Public Health "has seen this report and is very concerned about the contamination of NHS blood and blood products during the 1970s and 1980s. She is particularly concerned about how this issue has been handled. The Minister feels that it is clearly not acceptable in such tragic and unique circumstance for DH [Department of Health] to claim no liability and to give no more money to the Trusts."

Published on:

In a memo, Dr Rowena Jecock wrote regarding the Archer report that "We do not accept all his criticisms, but official documents do show problems at various times in the development of UK capabilities for manufacture of blood products" and acknowledged the judgment in A and Others v National Blood Authority commenting that "the UK could have introduced screening or surrogate tests for hepatitis C earlier than it did."

Published on:

The Minister of State for Public Health annotated a note regarding the Archer Inquiry report with the comment "What about more money?"

Published on:

Morven Smith sent emails containing further follow-up questions on the Minister's behalf on the Archer report.

Published on:

Dawn Primarolo met officials from the Health Protection team working on blood policy, following which the team were tasked with providing further information and analysis in order to formulate a response to the Archer report.

Published on:

An early day motion had been tabled for 3 March 2009 by Edward O'Hara MP regarding the Archer report.

Published on:

Baroness Glenys Thornton, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health in the Lords, answered a parliamentary question from Lord Alf Morris about when the Government expected to respond to the Archer report.

Published on:

It was suggested that the Government would respond to the Archer report when they had given the report the consideration it deserved.

Published on:

Dawn Primarolo had answered a Parliamentary Question regarding compensation for people with haemophilia who had been infected.

Published on:

A briefing had been given by Dr Rowena Jecock ahead of the planned meeting between Lord Archer, Dawn Primarolo and Alan Johnson.

Published on:

An email from Penelope Irwin had asked ministers for further advice regarding the different schemes and any alternatives to adopting Lord Archer's recommendations and to reassess financial relief for those affected.

Published on:

Lord Morris had made an amendment to the Health Bill to establish a committee as Lord Archer had recommended.

Published on:

A memo from Dr Jecock to Alan Johnson and Dawn Primarolo stated that the proposed amendment by Lord Morris, to establish a committee as Lord Archer had recommended, had been withdrawn.

Published on:

An email from Morven Smith to Brian Bradley outlined Baroness Primarolo's thinking about the different schemes and the proposal to do away with discretionary payments.

Published on:

Inquiry publishes interim report

Published on:

A further update was provided to the team by Dr Jecock regarding the proposal to do away with discretionary payments, among other things.

Published on:

In an email from Morven Smith, he wrote on behalf of Baroness Primarolo asking those for proposals for options of dealing with Lord Archer's recommendations.

Published on:

Liz Woodeson had sent a response to Baroness Primarolo that addressed Lord Archer's recommendations with options.

Published on: